Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[6pack\]\s+shocks\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[6pack\]\s+shocks\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [6pack] shocks (score: 1): Author: "CARL CARLSON" <actionsl@mindspring.com>; Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 09:15:56 -0700; As per the rear shock conversion for the TR6 does anyone have some input as to why some cars have the mount break at the frame and some go for years with out a problem? I understand some conversions; /html/6pack/2007-09/msg00208.html (6,601 bytes)
2. RE: [6pack] shocks (score: 1): Author: "Navarrette, Vance" <vance.navarrette@intel.com>; Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 09:26:22 -0700; The current thinking is that some designs result in the shock bottoming out when fully compressed, and this causes frame cracking. Also to be avoided are designs that attach to the body tub. The pre; /html/6pack/2007-09/msg00209.html (7,739 bytes)
3. Re: [6pack] shocks (score: 1): Author: tr6taylor@webtv.net (Sally or Dick Taylor); Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 12:23:26 -0700; Carl--I suspect that those who have suffered from broken shock attachment points had one or more of the following happening: a) The rubber bump stop at the top of the trailing arm was too soft, or ot; /html/6pack/2007-09/msg00229.html (7,309 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]