Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Healeys\]\s+Comment\s+for\s+what\s+it\s+is\s+worth\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Healeys\]\s+Comment\s+for\s+what\s+it\s+is\s+worth\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [Healeys] Comment for what it is worth (score: 1): Author: John Sims <ahbn6@optonline.net>; Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 10:59:35 -0400; I for one enjoy political sniping, raunchy political jokes and cartoons however, this campaign has EIGHT months to go and it appears that it will be a no holds barred one with innuendos, mud slinging; /html/healeys/2008-03/msg00434.html (7,211 bytes)
2. Re: [Healeys] Comment for what it is worth (score: 1): Author: bspidell@comcast.net (Bob Spidell); Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 16:03:08 +0000; Well said, and I agree completely. This should apply to political statements disguised as jokes as well. bs -- ** Bob Spidell San Jose, CA bspidell@comcast.net '67 Austin-Healey 3000 '56 Austin-Heal; /html/healeys/2008-03/msg00439.html (9,433 bytes)
3. Re: [Healeys] Comment for what it is worth (score: 1): Author: "John Fredericks" <johnfredericks@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 10:18:02 -0700; Having followed this list for many years, I have little sympathy for those who now want to keep politics off the list. As with others, I have been offended by the Friday Funnies from time to time, ha; /html/healeys/2008-03/msg00441.html (10,660 bytes)
4. Re: [Healeys] Comment for what it is worth (score: 1): Author: Awgertoo@aol.com; Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 13:36:43 EDT; Perhaps the operative word here is "Funnies": Some folks have no sense of humor esp. when they are the owners of the ox being gored, so if it's not funny to them then it's just not okay regardless of; /html/healeys/2008-03/msg00442.html (9,036 bytes)
5. Re: [Healeys] Comment for what it is worth (score: 1): Author: "Eric (Rick) Wilkins" <e-wilkins@cox.net>; Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 10:43:19 -0700; That's why "Friday Funnies" is in the subject line. So people know to avoid them. _______________________________________________ Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html Healeys@autox.team.n; /html/healeys/2008-03/msg00443.html (8,069 bytes)
6. Re: [Healeys] Comment for what it is worth (score: 1): Author: the walkers <thewalkers@qwest.net>; Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 10:49:26 -0700; Come on, this is a silly argument. This list is supposed to be a world wide Healey website, not a political or joke forum. There is very little upside to sending in any off-topic stuff that one wants; /html/healeys/2008-03/msg00444.html (8,737 bytes)
7. Re: [Healeys] Comment for what it is worth (score: 1): Author: "Ronald J. Ray" <ronald-ray@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 12:53:44 -0600; I stopped read the so called Friday funnies soon after I joined this list. Primary because the few Friday funnies I did read were either sexist, racist, or off color at the least. So, naturally I did; /html/healeys/2008-03/msg00446.html (10,486 bytes)
8. Re: [Healeys] Comment for what it is worth (score: 1): Author: bspidell@comcast.net (Bob Spidell); Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 18:48:06 +0000; I'm not offended by political humor of any stripe. In fact, I usually enjoy it. What I read this morning was a right-leaning, mildly amusing political joke, followed by a heartfelt and poignant rejoi; /html/healeys/2008-03/msg00447.html (9,778 bytes)
9. Re: [Healeys] Comment for what it is worth (score: 1): Author: "Donald Paye" <dpaye@crocker.com>; Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 17:07:15 -0400; Well put. I could not agree more. Thank you. Don Paye BN1,BJ7,Sunbeam Tiger _______________________________________________ Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html Healeys@autox.team.net htt; /html/healeys/2008-03/msg00455.html (9,734 bytes)
10. Re: [Healeys] Comment for what it is worth (score: 1): Author: Carlos Cruz <healey3000bn7@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 16:09:20 -0700 (PDT); Absolutely Bob! I guess I always - well most of the time, unless of course it's Ed (sorry Ed), give the person the benefit of the doubt. In this case one joke begot a rebuttle joke. Funny or not, I g; /html/healeys/2008-03/msg00462.html (9,629 bytes)
11. Re: [Healeys] Comment for what it is worth (score: 1): Author: <tomfelts@windstream.net>; Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 20:05:09 -0400; I know I shouldn't do it, but--if you don't see the difference between your example joke below and the one Jim tried then --what can I say. And--tell me, where is the humor in it?? __________________; /html/healeys/2008-03/msg00464.html (11,160 bytes)
12. Re: [Healeys] Comment for what it is worth (score: 1): Author: "WILLIAM B LAWRENCE" <ynotink@msn.com>; Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2008 02:58:21 +0000; Let me dissent from your comment on one point. I agree that the initial message was a mildly amusing story with a right slant. The rejoinder was not in kind. It was not amusing, it was not even meant; /html/healeys/2008-03/msg00481.html (9,478 bytes)
13. Re: [Healeys] Comment for what it is worth (score: 1): Author: Bob Spidell <bspidell@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 22:52:45 -0700; Your point is valid, IMO (though a bit hair-splitting). And the counterattack on Jim was right out of the Karl Rove/RNC/Swift Boat handbook. I hope I live long enough to witness the demise of both (; /html/healeys/2008-03/msg00490.html (9,670 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]