Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Healeys\]\s+List\s+message\s+limits\s*$/: 26 ]

Total 26 documents matching your query.

1. [Healeys] List message limits (score: 1)
Author: "Mark J. Bradakis" <mark@bradakis.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2007 19:16:11 -0700
Here's someting I recently sent to another Team.Net list. It would be nice if folks paid attention to it. mjb. -- Well, yes and no, sort of. It is an arbitrary limit I just picked. On some of the oth
/html/healeys/2007-11/msg00017.html (9,510 bytes)

2. Re: [Healeys] List message limits (score: 1)
Author: <legal_bill@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2007 22:27:05 -0500 (CDT)
Here's someting I recently sent to another Team.Net list. It would be nice if folks paid attention to it. mjb. -- Bill Boston area '65 BJ8 '02 S2000 '06 330i _________________________________________
/html/healeys/2007-11/msg00020.html (8,060 bytes)

3. Re: [Healeys] List message limits (score: 1)
Author: Roland Wilhelmy <rwil@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2007 20:43:54 -0700
How about leaving the list like it is? -Roland _______________________________________________ Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html Healeys@autox.team.net http://autox.team.net/mailman/li
/html/healeys/2007-11/msg00021.html (7,764 bytes)

4. Re: [Healeys] List message limits (score: 1)
Author: "Greg Wilkinson" <gregwilkinson@roadrunner.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2007 05:46:14 -0700
There is one, been there for several years now. Not many people post to it http://www.team.net/the-local/tiki-index.php _______________________________________________ Support Team.Net http://www.tea
/html/healeys/2007-11/msg00026.html (7,981 bytes)

5. Re: [Healeys] List message limits (score: 1)
Author: <legal_bill@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2007 07:35:32 -0600 (CST)
Sure, that's fine. If you just want to limit the community that talks about Healeys everyday, and shares their wide base of knowlege with a small group, keep it as it is. But if you are really want t
/html/healeys/2007-11/msg00027.html (9,393 bytes)

6. Re: [Healeys] List message limits (score: 1)
Author: "Greg Lemon" <glemon@neb.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2007 08:37:25 -0500
There is a fairly active (although in my opinion not as active as our list) Healey message board at British Car Forum. Many of the same people list and lurk there as here. For what it is worth I woul
/html/healeys/2007-11/msg00028.html (8,026 bytes)

7. Re: [Healeys] List message limits (score: 1)
Author: steven rosenberg md <palmbeachderm@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2007 06:49:34 -0700 (PDT)
I'm new to this (24 hours) but agree that rather than getting numerous emails that may be irrelevant today but helpful tomorrow, it would be better to have a site with forums based on specific topics
/html/healeys/2007-11/msg00029.html (10,380 bytes)

8. Re: [Healeys] List message limits (score: 1)
Author: John Sims <ahbn6@optonline.net>
Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2007 10:18:21 -0400
We have that now. It is called the List Archives. I like the concept of the list in which emails pop up on my computer all day long and I can pick and choose which are of interest to me. I do not lik
/html/healeys/2007-11/msg00030.html (8,917 bytes)

9. Re: [Healeys] List message limits (score: 1)
Author: "Brits'n'Pieces \(Eric Frenken\)" <lists@brits-n-pieces.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2007 15:23:17 +0100
If my vote counts (if any but Mark's count), I'd rather keep the list format as it is. Eric Germany We have that now. It is called the List Archives. I like the concept of the list in which emails po
/html/healeys/2007-11/msg00031.html (8,396 bytes)

10. Re: [Healeys] List message limits (score: 1)
Author: "bluechip" <bluechipracing@snet.net>
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2007 10:40:36 -0400
Jim Smith _______________________________________________ Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html Healeys@autox.team.net http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/healeys
/html/healeys/2007-11/msg00032.html (8,276 bytes)

11. Re: [Healeys] List message limits (score: 1)
Author: "Fred Wescoe" <fredwescoe@windstream.net>
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2007 10:47:51 -0400
I agree with this. The list is fine the way it is. Fred 63 BJ 7 -- Original Message -- From: "bluechip" <bluechipracing@snet.net> To: <healeys@autox.team.net> Sent: Friday, November 02, 2007 10:40 AM
/html/healeys/2007-11/msg00033.html (9,553 bytes)

12. Re: [Healeys] List message limits (score: 1)
Author: "Alan" <alanb@nfahc.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2007 15:06:03 -0000
FWIW - the internet is all things to everyone. I participate in the list because the format and shared immediacy suits me. I feel that I am part of a support group, rather than a detached observer.
/html/healeys/2007-11/msg00034.html (9,512 bytes)

13. Re: [Healeys] List message limits (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Poague" <rapoague@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2007 09:49:06 -0700
I vote to keep the List the way it is. Bob BJ7 _______________________________________________ Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html Healeys@autox.team.net http://autox.team.net/mailman/li
/html/healeys/2007-11/msg00036.html (8,308 bytes)

14. Re: [Healeys] List message limits (score: 1)
Author: "E.A. Driver" <edriver@sasktel.net>
Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2007 11:00:57 -0600
Hello Alan You are right on, I couldn't have said it better. I think those that need super interactive sites such as forums or web sites are bored, or in need of an ego boost, or easily buy into in s
/html/healeys/2007-11/msg00037.html (10,532 bytes)

15. Re: [Healeys] List message limits (score: 1)
Author: steven rosenberg md <palmbeachderm@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2007 10:50:26 -0700 (PDT)
how do i access the sites archives? that would be extremely helpful for me. "E.A. Driver" <edriver@sasktel.net> wrote: Hello Alan You are right on, I couldn't have said it better. I think those that
/html/healeys/2007-11/msg00038.html (11,318 bytes)

16. Re: [Healeys] List message limits (score: 1)
Author: Awgertoo@aol.com
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2007 19:34:17 EDT
Mark was not asking for a vote on whether we liked this list's format or rules or whether we wanted it to be a forum. He merely asked us to keep our messages short by not copying unnecessarily from e
/html/healeys/2007-11/msg00047.html (8,181 bytes)

17. Re: [Healeys] List message limits (score: 1)
Author: <legal_bill@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2007 21:54:12 -0500 (CDT)
Greg, I understand your point, but the message boards that exist are not really specific to the Healey. And let's face it, this list is where all the people who really know what they are talking abou
/html/healeys/2007-11/msg00049.html (9,276 bytes)

18. [Healeys] List message limits (score: 1)
Author: Daniel and Diane White <dwhite4949@wowway.com>
Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2007 08:08:05 -0400
I agree with Michael. Mark's message was very clear- if certain listers stop hitting the "reply" symbol, all the previous messages on a subject won't clog up and slow down the system. My two pfennigs
/html/healeys/2007-11/msg00053.html (8,118 bytes)

19. Re: [Healeys] List message limits (score: 1)
Author: "Alan Seigrist" <healey.nut@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2007 21:36:47 +0800
I'd like to ask if you can program the server to automatically generate witty and insulting posts to those that put up annoying messages, that would be way cool. Actually several of us have had issu
/html/healeys/2007-11/msg00054.html (8,551 bytes)

20. Re: [Healeys] List message limits (score: 1)
Author: "Leonard Hartnett" <thehartnetts@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2007 20:51:54 -0700
Reducing the size of messages is fine but there is another side to this matter. If we are to eliminate all previous messages, then there needs to be a rule that says you can't say, "Thanks for your a
/html/healeys/2007-11/msg00074.html (9,067 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu