- 1. Re: [Healeys] Rocker Ratio Redux (score: 1)
- Author: Walt Peterson <walt2727@yahoo.com>
- Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 08:57:27 -0800 (PST)
- Yep: Jim Hockert says 1:45. I'm looking at roller rockers 1:65 but am afraid the set-up may need a tall valve cover even without a cam. Anyone? Walt Nominal 1:1.5, though in reality it's a bit less I
- /html/healeys/2010-01/msg00163.html (8,183 bytes)
- 2. Re: [Healeys] Rocker Ratio Redux (score: 1)
- Author: John Vrugtman <javrugtman@htcnet.org>
- Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2010 13:24:02 -0500
- I've a set from Rockerarm specialists and they fit under the stock valve cover. John _______________________________________________ Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html Healeys@autox.tea
- /html/healeys/2010-01/msg00166.html (9,173 bytes)
- 3. Re: [Healeys] Rocker Ratio Redux (score: 1)
- Author: "PG" <britishcars@shaw.ca>
- Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 10:40:54 -0800
- I have 1.65 roller rockers on my car....stock valve cover is not a However, you need to be careful with the geometry of the pushrods. With the larger ratios, the angle and deflection of the pushrods
- /html/healeys/2010-01/msg00168.html (10,313 bytes)
- 4. Re: [Healeys] Rocker Ratio Redux (score: 1)
- Author: "John Sims" <ahbn6@verizon.net>
- Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2010 15:46:32 -0500
- I did a Google search on them and came up with a different URL which also is bad. HOWEVER, several other sites give them rather glowing reviews. If anyone is interested, their vitals are: Rocker Arm
- /html/healeys/2010-01/msg00185.html (9,018 bytes)
- 5. Re: [Healeys] Rocker Ratio Redux (score: 1)
- Author: richard mayor <mayorrichard@hotmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 01:20:50 +0000
- The stock rocker arm ratio is 1.43:1. Richard Mayor BN7L-466 Vintage Racer Portland, Oregon afraid _________________________________________________________________ Hotmail: Trusted email with powerf
- /html/healeys/2010-01/msg00200.html (10,843 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu