Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[evolution\-disc\.\]\s+Re\:\s+modifying\s+OEM\s+shocks\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[evolution\-disc\.\]\s+Re\:\s+modifying\s+OEM\s+shocks\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [evolution-disc.] Re: modifying OEM shocks (score: 1): Author: Rob Foley <RobertJFoley@compuserve.com>; Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 21:59:09 -0500; This is all 100% technically correct, and I can say that as a P.E. with fluids and flow knowledge. I'm staying away from the secret handshake stuff at the end that I have deleted in the reply text re; /html/autox/2002-03/msg00268.html (8,901 bytes)
2. RE: [evolution-disc.] Re: modifying OEM shocks (score: 1): Author: "Eric Salem" <eric@mail.brown911.com>; Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 21:18:55 -0600; Isn't the class called Stock? How's this for a rule: If the OEM manufacturer no longer makes the part, then and only then, can you use a non-OEM shock. Saves people money. Shortens the rule book. --O; /html/autox/2002-03/msg00269.html (9,828 bytes)
3. Re: [evolution-disc.] Re: modifying OEM shocks (score: 1): Author: TeamZ06@aol.com; Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 07:32:23 EST; My post was only intended to address a portion of the argument proposing OEM-only shocks, rather than address a lengthy diatribe point by point. Enforcement of shock absorbers & struts will not be as; /html/autox/2002-03/msg00277.html (8,905 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]