- 1. Re: [evolution-disc.] SM2 survival (score: 1)
- Author: Kevin Stevens <Kevin_Stevens@pursued-with.net>
- Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 12:15:06 -0800 (PST)
- Yes. So, it's people who think there are too many classes who are responsible for the class succeeding or failing, not an actual failure of people to participate? I'll have to kick the tires before I
- /html/autox/2002-03/msg00187.html (7,559 bytes)
- 2. Re: [evolution-disc.] SM2 survival (score: 1)
- Author: bthatch@juno.com
- Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 17:03:05 -0500
- Well, let's see, we have Stock, Street Touring and Street Mod for streetable cars. Everything else is non-streetable if you take them to the limit of the rules. My prediction is that if the SM classe
- /html/autox/2002-03/msg00193.html (9,195 bytes)
- 3. Re: [evolution-disc.] SM2 survival (score: 1)
- Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>
- Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 17:44:19 -0600
- for If you include SM as a "streetable" class, then you have to include SP. Why? Because SM allows _everything_ you can do in SP, and then some more. Lots and lots more. And Street Mod isn't? Hahahah
- /html/autox/2002-03/msg00195.html (10,254 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu