Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[oletrucks\]\s+55\s+road\s+draft\s+tube\s+\?\'s\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[oletrucks\]\s+55\s+road\s+draft\s+tube\s+\?\'s\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [oletrucks] 55 road draft tube ?'s (score: 1): Author: VIDEOEIC@aol.com; Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 11:04:29 EDT; Here's my question. I am putting the 265 back in my 55 2nd and dont have the road draft tube yet, when I look down the hole where it goes I see a loose,old,dry rubber grommet about a inch wide with; /html/oletrucks/2000-05/msg00120.html (7,938 bytes)
2. RE: [oletrucks] 55 road draft tube ?'s (score: 1): Author: "Peters, Jon C" <jpeters@sikorsky.com>; Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 11:38:42 -0400; The bolt that holds the vent tube onto the block goes through the grommet and threads into the block. I have a 283 with this set-up, the tube was squashed so I ran a stainless overbrade hose clamped; /html/oletrucks/2000-05/msg00121.html (8,944 bytes)
3. Re: [oletrucks] 55 road draft tube ?'s (score: 1): Author: ADvent@thuntek.net; Date: Thu, 04 May 2000 13:44:21 -0600; if you are not going with "as manufactured" restoration, i would recommend doing away with the draft tube and go with a PCV. you could mount the PCV in the place of the draft tube. oletrucks is devot; /html/oletrucks/2000-05/msg00155.html (8,398 bytes)
4. Re: [oletrucks] 55 road draft tube ?'s (score: 1): Author: Advdesign1@aol.com; Date: Thu, 4 May 2000 22:22:51 EDT; PCV valve was on the option or accesory list since about 1950, so you can be stock and have your PCV valve. Like having your cake and eating it too. Bob ADler oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM tr; /html/oletrucks/2000-05/msg00169.html (7,731 bytes)
5. Re: [oletrucks] 55 road draft tube ?'s (score: 1): Author: "G. Simmons" <gls@4link.net>; Date: Thu, 4 May 2000 21:04:36 -0700; Is there anything desirable (other than eliminating the road tube) about PCV? Isn't it essentially recirculating blow-by back into the intake? I would think that is undesirable, other than from a smo; /html/oletrucks/2000-05/msg00181.html (7,701 bytes)
6. Re: [oletrucks] 55 road draft tube ?'s (score: 1): Author: Advdesign1@aol.com; Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 06:12:27 EDT; Very desirable. As you burn fuel, water vapor is produced that finds its way to oil. Same with gasoline when choke is on. sulfur in gas burns and some SO2 also dissolvs in the moisture in oil formin; /html/oletrucks/2000-05/msg00183.html (8,353 bytes)
7. Re: [oletrucks] 55 road draft tube ?'s (score: 1): Author: MarkNoakes@aol.com; Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 07:12:56 EDT; Since I'm sure that your setup looked as stock as possible, is there any way that you could post pictures? Thanks, Mark Noakes 58/56 Suburban Knoxville, TN << > Is there anything desirable (other th; /html/oletrucks/2000-05/msg00185.html (8,502 bytes)
8. Re: [oletrucks] 55 road draft tube ?'s (score: 1): Author: "Woody" <woodrow@isomedia.com>; Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 19:25:31 -0700; I ran a 350 Chevy with 9 to 1 compression and a mild performance cam on a dyno, and the difference from without to with a PCV was 15 HP and a comparable torque gain. Woody 53 GMC Carnation, WA --Orig; /html/oletrucks/2000-05/msg00210.html (8,403 bytes)
9. Re: [oletrucks] 55 road draft tube ?'s (score: 1): Author: ADvent@thuntek.net; Date: Sat, 06 May 2000 16:53:48 -0600; Absolutely no performance gain or loss. This is better for the air, it will reduce HC's by 25% or more! It also helps to reduce sludge and varnish from forming in the engine which is nothing more tha; /html/oletrucks/2000-05/msg00232.html (8,285 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]