Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[oletrucks\]\s+I\-6\s+turbo\s+wonderings\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[oletrucks\]\s+I\-6\s+turbo\s+wonderings\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [oletrucks] I-6 turbo wonderings (score: 1): Author: CLLLSLS@aol.com; Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2000 23:42:39 EST; This question would prolly get the same number of replies if I sent it to the whole list or just Grant Galbraith, but you never know. Just out of shear curiosity, how many of our chevy/GMC I-6's have; /html/oletrucks/2000-02/msg00517.html (7,865 bytes)
2. Re: [oletrucks] I-6 turbo wonderings (score: 1): Author: "Rob Steinmetz" <rstein@sssnet.com>; Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2000 07:57:35 -0500; You're not alone. I think it would be an excellent engine to put a turbo on. I don't think a high RPM horsepower increase is what the engine needs. If one could use a turbo that delivers power simila; /html/oletrucks/2000-02/msg00522.html (9,123 bytes)
3. Re: [oletrucks] I-6 turbo wonderings (score: 1): Author: MarkNoakes@aol.com; Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2000 08:02:51 EST; I would suppose that would have alot to do with how much boost you wanted to run and how advanced the turbo setup was. . .wastegate, water injection, controls, etc. Being more the small block type, I; /html/oletrucks/2000-02/msg00523.html (8,672 bytes)
4. Re: [oletrucks] I-6 turbo wonderings (score: 1): Author: ADvent@thuntek.net; Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2000 08:28:29 -0700; One thing I would not ry to do is extend the rpm range. I would start out at a boost, like about 2 or 3 pounds and see what happens. And go up from there. The 235 and its cousin's will die the same f; /html/oletrucks/2000-02/msg00530.html (8,602 bytes)
5. Re: [oletrucks] I-6 turbo wonderings (score: 1): Author: Joseph Rennie Weertz <jweertz@umich.edu>; Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2000 14:30:35 -0500 (EST); What about from a harley? or other motorcycle??? just off of the top of my head joe weertz 50 3100 oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 1941 and 1959; /html/oletrucks/2000-02/msg00540.html (9,717 bytes)
6. Re: [oletrucks] I-6 turbo wonderings (score: 1): Author: LandBBall@aol.com; Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2000 15:01:46 EST; To you turbo guys its grate to see such interest in turbos. I think there grate as I have posted before I have two turbocharged 350s at present one in a 79 blazer 4x4 and one in OLE Shep a 58 fleetsi; /html/oletrucks/2000-02/msg00541.html (8,018 bytes)
7. Re: [oletrucks] I-6 turbo wonderings (score: 1): Author: Jack Halton <safesix@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2000 15:18:58 -0500 (EST); There are some very good books available on Turbocharging, from HP books and other sources. All agree that the inline engine is a "natural" for the turbo treatment, from the perspective of both packa; /html/oletrucks/2000-02/msg00542.html (8,783 bytes)
8. Re: [oletrucks] I-6 turbo wonderings (score: 1): Author: LandBBall@aol.com; Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2000 17:06:22 EST; I agree Turbochargers by Hugh Macinnes is probably the best book to start I still have and use it for reference all the time. To my knowledge last printing was 1976 Although turbos have come a long w; /html/oletrucks/2000-02/msg00546.html (7,685 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]