Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[oletrucks\]\s+IFS\s+vs\.\s+Stock\.\:\s+Lowering\s+Without\s+IFS\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[oletrucks\]\s+IFS\s+vs\.\s+Stock\.\:\s+Lowering\s+Without\s+IFS\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [oletrucks] IFS vs. Stock.: Lowering Without IFS (score: 1): Author: Devin Ranger <devin_ranger@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 14:22:28 -0800 (PST); Hello Bill. There are a few things that I can think of that you can do to drop your front ride height: Dropped Axle -- considered dangerous by many, this is an axle that has had the upturned portion; /html/oletrucks/2003-02/msg00360.html (8,869 bytes)
2. Re: [oletrucks] IFS vs. Stock.: Lowering Without IFS (score: 1): Author: wayne osborne <wayne@chevytrucks.org>; Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 19:13:45 -0500; Hi all, I have installed monos on the front of my 56 and am for the most part, satisfied with them. They did bring the front down to a stance that i am happy with - the top of the tire 'bout an inch; /html/oletrucks/2003-02/msg00362.html (10,667 bytes)
3. RE: [oletrucks] IFS vs. Stock.: Lowering Without IFS (score: 1): Author: Devin Ranger <devin_ranger@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 09:14:18 -0800 (PST); Hello. Some people feel that it is dangerous because removing springs significantly alters the spring pack; this is a part that offers structural support. There is less rigidity after leaves have be; /html/oletrucks/2003-02/msg00382.html (8,378 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]