Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[oletrucks\]\s+Lowering\s+a\s+59\,\s+wheel\/fender\s+fit\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[oletrucks\]\s+Lowering\s+a\s+59\,\s+wheel\/fender\s+fit\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [oletrucks] Lowering a 59, wheel/fender fit (score: 1): Author: J Forbes <jforbes@primenet.com>; Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2000 10:36:46 -0700; I did a bit more tinkering with my 57 Suburban (which will look like a 59 when I'm done with it, as I'm swapping front sheetmetal from a 59 onto it to make it look like my other trucks). I put a Cam; /html/oletrucks/2000-12/msg00345.html (9,083 bytes)
2. Re: [oletrucks] Lowering a 59, wheel/fender fit (score: 1): Author: "Claude" <cramey@dashlink.com>; Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2000 14:51:25 -0600; Jim, It looks good to me. I think its positioned very good. 1959 Apache Fleetside http://www.dashlink.com/~rameyfam oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 1941 and 1959; /html/oletrucks/2000-12/msg00349.html (10,117 bytes)
3. Re: [oletrucks] Lowering a 59, wheel/fender fit (score: 1): Author: MKlepp4335@cs.com; Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2000 20:21:44 EST; << If I were going to lower it any more, I'd have to fix it, but I think it's close enough that no one will notice. Opinions? >> Looks good to me, I wouldn't change it any. Mike Klepp '48 3100 Wichit; /html/oletrucks/2000-12/msg00358.html (7,682 bytes)
4. Re: [oletrucks] Lowering a 59, wheel/fender fit (score: 1): Author: Passnb4U@aol.com; Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2000 23:41:41 EST; I think the location is fine Jim, it looks to sit about 4 inches lower than my '59 (with 55/56 sheetmetal on it, guess we have opposing view;) ) I think I have about 2 inches from the top of the tire; /html/oletrucks/2000-12/msg00369.html (8,067 bytes)
5. Re: [oletrucks] Lowering a 59, wheel/fender fit (score: 1): Author: Wayne Osborne <wayne@chevytrucks.org>; Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 11:27:06 -0500; In the January issue of Classic Trucks there is a 55 GMC in the Classic Cruisers (Readers Rides) that shows a clip job with a Camero subframe and the setup was not moved forward any. Don't mean to di; /html/oletrucks/2000-12/msg00375.html (10,210 bytes)
6. RE: [oletrucks] Lowering a 59, wheel/fender fit (score: 1): Author: "BORDER,RYAN (HP-FtCollins,ex1)" <ryan_border@hp.com>; Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 10:09:54 -0700; A related question: how much does the rear end height seem change the looks of the front wheelwell? Sitting here thinking about it, a higher rear end would angle the top of the front wheel-well, whic; /html/oletrucks/2000-12/msg00384.html (9,948 bytes)
7. RE: [oletrucks] Lowering a 59, wheel/fender fit (score: 1): Author: Wayne Osborne <wayne@chevytrucks.org>; Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2000 10:44:17 -0500; I'd think you've have to have a real real difference in stance for that illusion to take place. The trucks that are done "wrong" are real noticable that something is not right. Wayne Wayne Osborne 19; /html/oletrucks/2000-12/msg00415.html (10,984 bytes)
8. Re: [oletrucks] Lowering a 59, wheel/fender fit (score: 1): Author: "joe" <chevy1@jps.net>; Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2000 10:48:13 -0800; You really get that pulled back tire effect on the front fender more with a leaf spring suspension. The opposite effect takes place at the rearend as that tire moves forward in the fender opening. lo; /html/oletrucks/2000-12/msg00420.html (11,876 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]