Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[oletrucks\]\s+Parts\s+truck\?\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [oletrucks] Parts truck? (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Hanberg" <steve@OldSub.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2003 09:15:43 -0700
Yesterday I drove my old Suburban to work. At the place where I stop for coffee a guy struck up a conversation and offered me a '48 3/4-ton Chevy. I talked to him today and got a little more informat
/html/oletrucks/2003-04/msg00152.html (8,009 bytes)

2. Re: [oletrucks] Parts truck? (score: 1)
Author: Mask1966@aol.com
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2003 12:45:48 EDT
If you have ever driven an AD without wing windows (and NO air) compared to one with vent windows, there is a big difference. My black '48 in August here in Texas is a killer. God bless stock trucks!
/html/oletrucks/2003-04/msg00154.html (7,689 bytes)

3. Re: [oletrucks] Parts truck? (score: 1)
Author: "william moldenhauer" <wmh678@worldnet.att.net>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2003 14:56:07 -0500
I prefer the 3/4 ton frame because the front is exactly the same dimensions as the 1/2 ton and the rear frame rails are closer together so putting on wider tires is not a problem unless you are resto
/html/oletrucks/2003-04/msg00160.html (9,054 bytes)

4. Re: [oletrucks] Parts truck? (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Hanberg" <steve@OldSub.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2003 13:32:03 -0700
Maybe I could do my frame and suspension work on the 3/4-ton frame, and then move the body off my suburban onto that frame when the times comes... I prefer the 3/4 ton frame because the front is exac
/html/oletrucks/2003-04/msg00165.html (9,496 bytes)

5. Re: [oletrucks] Parts truck? (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Hanberg" <steve@OldSub.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2003 18:45:54 -0700
I stopped and looked at it on the way home from work. Its missing the front bumper but otherwise appears complete, and mostly unmolested. That's the good news. I checked the cab corners on the passen
/html/oletrucks/2003-04/msg00177.html (10,399 bytes)

6. Re: [oletrucks] Parts truck? (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Hanberg" <steve@OldSub.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2003 19:46:21 -0700
Forgot to mention that its a five-window, and while the glass in both doors and the windshield is badly cracked, the rear window is only clouded and has some bubbles in it. The corner glass looked pe
/html/oletrucks/2003-04/msg00178.html (10,950 bytes)

7. Re: [oletrucks] Parts truck? (score: 1)
Author: Rich Kosiba <kosibar@kolbenet.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2003 22:49:52 -0400 (EDT)
I'm a firm believer in parts trucks. I got a '47 for $150 back when I was restoring my '50. It's amazing how many parts I got off that thing! I managed to get a few bigger things, like the pan over
/html/oletrucks/2003-04/msg00179.html (12,358 bytes)

8. Re: [oletrucks] Parts truck? (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Hanberg" <steve@OldSub.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2003 19:55:00 -0700
Those are probably good reasons to go ahead and get it. Since it would make truck number four in my yard its my wife who may not understand... I didn't think about the wheels maybe not turning. Its b
/html/oletrucks/2003-04/msg00180.html (13,270 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu