Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[oletrucks\]\s+Stroked\s+vs\.\s+De\-stroked\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[oletrucks\]\s+Stroked\s+vs\.\s+De\-stroked\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [oletrucks] Stroked vs. De-stroked (score: 1): Author: "Ed Orbea" <orbea@tscnet.com>; Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 18:00:03 -0800; I am "restifying" a 1953 Chevy 5 window. My plans include a 9" 3.53:1 ford differential, TH400 Transmission and a 400 cuin small block. While at the local auto parts store, one of the countermen was; /html/oletrucks/2004-03/msg00009.html (7,050 bytes)
2. Re: [oletrucks] Stroked vs. De-stroked (score: 1): Author: mark@noakes.com; Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 18:55:21 -0800 (PST); Destroking means decreasing the stroke thereby decreasing the overall effective inches of the engine. The only advantage this can give is a higher redline if it is balanced properly...which is only u; /html/oletrucks/2004-03/msg00012.html (7,769 bytes)
3. Re: [oletrucks] Stroked vs. De-stroked (score: 1): Author: "Kirk Pierce" <kpier883@bellsouth.net>; Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 22:30:59 -0600; If the stroke is shorter, then theoretically the rpm range for the engine would be higher. I have a brother that races dirt track and runs a 400 block with a 3.25" stroke crank so that he can use num; /html/oletrucks/2004-03/msg00017.html (7,160 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]