- 1. [oletrucks] Transmission cross member (score: 1)
- Author: "William Schickling" <wschick1@twcny.rr.com>
- Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 19:24:00 -0500
- I have been working on the chassis and drive train for my truck for some time now. I have a T-5 transmission hooked up to my 235. I have an issue with the original transmission cross member and the m
- /html/oletrucks/2005-02/msg00013.html (8,294 bytes)
- 2. RE: [oletrucks] Transmission cross member (score: 1)
- Author: "SCH (OldSub)" <Steve@oldsub.com>
- Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 17:36:25 -0800
- My '55 1st has an open driveline transmission hanging off the bellhousing with no other support. Steve@OldSub.com www.OldSub.com Are other people running open drive line transmissions that are not su
- /html/oletrucks/2005-02/msg00014.html (7,434 bytes)
- 3. RE: [oletrucks] Transmission cross member (score: 1)
- Author: "Hanlon, Bill (ISS Houston)" <bill.hanlon@hp.com>
- Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 23:43:01 -0600
- My '57 GMC with factory Hydra-Matic has no transmission support. My '55 1st has an open driveline transmission hanging off the bellhousing with no other support. Steve@OldSub.com www.OldSub.com Are o
- /html/oletrucks/2005-02/msg00015.html (7,780 bytes)
- 4. RE: [oletrucks] Transmission cross member (score: 1)
- Author: J Forbes <jforb@mindspring.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 21:02:01 -0700
- The 55-59 trucks all use an open driveline, and no support under the rear of the tranny (the tranny hangs from the bellhousing). But the bellhousing mounts are a different design, with a large rubbe
- /html/oletrucks/2005-02/msg00020.html (8,222 bytes)
- 5. Re: [oletrucks] Transmission cross member (score: 1)
- Author: "Mike Sergesketter" <mserges@psci.net>
- Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 10:38:23 -0500
- My 48 has the same setup, no crossmember....but then again, it's still not on the road.... oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 1941 and 1959
- /html/oletrucks/2005-02/msg00065.html (7,065 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu