Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[oletrucks\]\s+late\s+model\s+p\/u\s+ifs\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[oletrucks\]\s+late\s+model\s+p\/u\s+ifs\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [oletrucks] late model p/u ifs (score: 1): Author: Barb & Jack Boedigheimer <Boedigheimer@planacc.com>; Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2000 19:18:50 +0900; I have a 79 3/4 ton front end that I want to put under my 49 GMC 3/4 ton. The problem of course is the track width. Is there anyone out there who has done it and if so did it look to wide to the casu; /html/oletrucks/2000-03/msg00614.html (7,066 bytes)
2. Re: [oletrucks] late model p/u ifs (score: 1): Author: J Forbes <jforbes@primenet.com>; Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2000 08:56:52 -0700; There's an early 50s Chevy truck in Tucson with a 70s or 80s 3/4 front clip under it. Even with stock wheels, which have negative offset, the tires are past the fenders. I don't like the looks of it; /html/oletrucks/2000-03/msg00637.html (7,806 bytes)
3. Re: [oletrucks] late model p/u ifs (score: 1): Author: Vince Kieffer <vk30345@navix.net>; Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2000 12:22:45 -0800; I looked at using the IFS off of a 74 Chevy pickup and came to the same conclusion, its to wide, and it will raise the front end quite a bit. I can't see a way to narrow it, the A frames are just to; /html/oletrucks/2000-03/msg00644.html (8,468 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]