Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*9C\,\s+9CG\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*9C\,\s+9CG\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. 9C, 9CG (score: 1): Author: Herb_Goede@amsinc.com; Date: Thu, 4 Mar 1999 11:01:01 -0700; Here is one for the folks who know way too much. What is the difference between the 9C and 9CG engines. Anything external? Herb; /html/spridgets/1999-03/msg00190.html (7,292 bytes)
2. Re: 9C, 9CG (score: 1): Author: Frank Clarici <spritenut@Exit109.com>; Date: Thu, 04 Mar 1999 17:53:01 -0500; I am not possitive on this and I'm sure to be corrected if wrong but I think a 9CG had 1.25 carbs where the 9c only came with 1 1/8 carbs. -- Frank Clarici Toms River, NJ Bugeye Sprite 67 Sprite 59 A; /html/spridgets/1999-03/msg00192.html (8,255 bytes)
3. Re: 9C, 9CG (score: 1): Author: "Biff Jones" <biffjones@erols.com>; Date: Thu, 4 Mar 1999 18:38:17 -0500; Correct Frank! The 9CG engine was 'introduced' with the new Mark II along with the 1 1/4" carbs and a few other minor changes. Biff, AN5, 'Kermit' & HAN6, 'Ole Gray' difference but I carbs.; /html/spridgets/1999-03/msg00195.html (8,573 bytes)
4. Fw: 9C, 9CG (score: 1): Author: "Robert Duquette" <RobertDuquette@Sympatico.ca>; Date: Thu, 4 Mar 1999 18:45:48 -0500; ... and I thought that it was the 'G'?! --Original Message-- From: Frank Clarici <spritenut@Exit109.com> To: Herb_Goede@amsinc.com <Herb_Goede@amsinc.com> Cc: spridgets@autox.team.net <spridgets@auto; /html/spridgets/1999-03/msg00196.html (8,262 bytes)
5. RE: 9C, 9CG (score: 1): Author: "Wm. Severin Thompson" <wsthompson@thicko.com>; Date: Thu, 4 Mar 1999 18:21:46 -0600; To all, Have I been smokin' rope here... or do I remember that the CG designation also indicated it had cam bearings??? WST Team Thicko (been a long time since I smoked any rope...) --Original Messag; /html/spridgets/1999-03/msg00199.html (9,639 bytes)
6. Re: 9C, 9CG (score: 1): Author: Frank Clarici <spritenut@Exit109.com>; Date: Thu, 04 Mar 1999 19:48:32 -0500; Ahh the original post asked if there were any "visable" differences. Unless you have been smokin a lot of rope or have xray vision, you can not see those cam bearings. Keep on smokin (tires) Frank; /html/spridgets/1999-03/msg00200.html (8,059 bytes)
7. RE: 9C, 9CG (score: 1): Author: TYPE79@ix.netcom.com; Date: Thu, 4 Mar 1999 18:47:08 -0600 (CST); Yes that's correct. The 9C engine had one removable cam bearing while the 9CG had 3 removable cam bearings. Jay Fishbein, CT; /html/spridgets/1999-03/msg00201.html (9,474 bytes)
8. RE: 9C, 9CG (score: 1): Author: "Wm. Severin Thompson" <wsthompson@thicko.com>; Date: Thu, 4 Mar 1999 19:08:35 -0600; I read the original post at work, so I don't have it here to refer to... but I seem to remember "external" not visible... what are you smokin'? Anyway, I wanted to see if my memory was correct on th; /html/spridgets/1999-03/msg00206.html (8,831 bytes)
9. Re: 9C, 9CG (score: 1): Author: "Biff Jones" <biffjones@erols.com>; Date: Thu, 4 Mar 1999 20:23:48 -0500; The 9CG blocks did have three vice one camshaft bearings. Herb was looking for differences he could see from the outside. If the machine shop gave him a 9CG for his 9C block I would say he came out a; /html/spridgets/1999-03/msg00209.html (9,314 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]