Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Anti\-AOL\s+List\s+Manager\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Anti\-AOL\s+List\s+Manager\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Anti-AOL List Manager (score: 1): Author: Larryhoy@aol.com; Date: Wed, 11 Dec 1996 11:12:07 -0500; numbers their net perfect, I think you hit the nail on the head. After the free intro period if the subscriber just goes away and Marks mail bounces. I wonder if new AOL users could have a probation; /html/mgs/1996-12/msg01035.html (8,037 bytes)
2. Re: Anti-AOL List Manager (score: 1): Author: JKearman@aol.com; Date: Wed, 11 Dec 1996 09:23:51 -0500; resolved? separate It sounds like some people who try AOL sign on to the lists (and his numbers refer to all the lists, not just MGs), then just go away at the end of their free AOL time, without uns; /html/mgs/1996-12/msg01038.html (8,888 bytes)
3. Re: Anti-AOL List Manager (score: 1): Author: Eddie.Sheffield@telos.com (Eddie Sheffield); Date: Wed, 11 Dec 1996 11:44:46 -0500; Actually, while this is one problem, it sounds like the MAJOR problems are the way the AOL servers pass the e-mail and the 100 message limit they impose on their users. The only thing an AOL user ca; /html/mgs/1996-12/msg01048.html (8,094 bytes)
4. Re: Anti-AOL List Manager (score: 1): Author: car@texas.net (Carol); Date: Wed, 11 Dec 1996 14:16:47 -0600 (CST); I agree 100%, Eddie. I wouldn't trade Texas Net for anything, and (I don't mean to sound or be offensive to anyone here) I have NEVER liked AOL or their practices. I had it for about two hours, and f; /html/mgs/1996-12/msg01070.html (7,460 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]