Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Bad\s+PARTS\s+from\s+Moss\s+WAS\s+Bad\s+\"RUBBER\"\s+Parts\s+from\s+Moss\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Bad\s+PARTS\s+from\s+Moss\s+WAS\s+Bad\s+\"RUBBER\"\s+Parts\s+from\s+Moss\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Bad PARTS from Moss WAS Bad "RUBBER" Parts from Moss (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 18:50:18 -0400; So, If I understand you correctly, - In the interests of economy, it is better to offer a poor fitting repro than an expensive but correct replacement part. - In certain cases, your company is unabl; /html/spridgets/2000-06/msg01257.html (11,622 bytes)
2. Re: Bad PARTS from Moss WAS Bad "RUBBER" Parts from Moss (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 19:28:42 -0400; While I understand your complaint, and to some extent I agree with it, lighten up on Kelvin a bit. 1) He admits that there's a problem. 2) He (fairly) points out that the solutions aren't simple. Yo; /html/spridgets/2000-06/msg01259.html (12,393 bytes)
3. Re: Bad PARTS from Moss WAS Bad "RUBBER" Parts from Moss (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 21:10:53 -0700; I understand what you are saying and I don't have anything personal against Kelvin. (I do wish he made his response to me public rather than private, but that was his decision.) I just have a proble; /html/spridgets/2000-06/msg01262.html (8,164 bytes)
4. Re: Bad PARTS from Moss WAS Bad "RUBBER" Parts from Moss (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2000 12:01:15 EDT; << Many of the parts we - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I missed the beginning of this thread (sorry Jay) but here is a suggestion for Moss. How about adding a set of symbols to the listings in t; /html/spridgets/2000-06/msg01388.html (8,233 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]