Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*British\s+Mechanics\s+Suck\s+$cont\.$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*British\s+Mechanics\s+Suck\s+$cont\.$\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. British Mechanics Suck (cont.) (score: 1): Author: "Paula J. Graffam" <pjgraffam@juno.com>; Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 11:59:12 -0500; Thanks for all the response about this issue. I believe I have seen my last professional mechanic to work on the 6. My confidence level soared when I told all my backyard wrench buddies that I fixed; /html/6pack/2004-01/msg00340.html (6,927 bytes)
2. Re: British Mechanics Suck (cont.) (score: 1): Author: genehart@att.net; Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 18:07:04 +0000; I loved your response, You should see the look on the pros faces when they see my restoration. All they can say is something stupid, like "We'll cars were easier to fix back in those day's" or "You'; /html/6pack/2004-01/msg00342.html (7,510 bytes)
3. Fwd: British Mechanics Suck (cont.) (score: 1): Author: StuBeatty@aol.com; Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2004 08:38:52 EST; Return-path: <StuBeatty@aol.com> From: StuBeatty@aol.com Full-name: StuBeatty Message-ID: <1e2.1803d3a7.2d43cc07@aol.com> Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2004 08:24:23 EST Subject: Re: British Mechanics Suck (cont; /html/6pack/2004-01/msg00353.html (8,471 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]