Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Bugeye\s+Period\s+Performance\s+Tune\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Bugeye\s+Period\s+Performance\s+Tune\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Bugeye Period Performance Tune (score: 1): Author: Philip Hubbard <hubbard@idir.net>; Date: Fri, 26 Feb 1999 09:26:38 -0600; Wondering if anyone has experience with taking a stock 948cc Bugeye engine and tricking it out with all the =period= tune options. Obviously a Judson Supercharger would be big here and therefore I wo; /html/spridgets/1999-02/msg01333.html (7,557 bytes)
2. Re: Bugeye Period Performance Tune (score: 1): Author: GMari58175@aol.com; Date: Fri, 26 Feb 1999 12:57:28 EST; << Obviously a Judson Supercharger would be big here and therefore I wonder how George M is doing with his lately. >> My Judson installation went according to plan. That is carb rebuilds, and jet tri; /html/spridgets/1999-02/msg01342.html (7,668 bytes)
3. Re: Bugeye Period Performance Tune (score: 1): Author: Daniel1312@aol.com; Date: Fri, 26 Feb 1999 17:01:51 EST; << I just wonder if it is any substitute for dropping in a 1275 engine, 5 speed etc >> The problem is that neither the Shorrock or Judson like high rpm and ultimately that restricts the amount of pow; /html/spridgets/1999-02/msg01351.html (7,453 bytes)
4. RE: Bugeye Period Performance Tune (score: 1): Author: "Wm. Severin Thompson" <wsthompson@thicko.com>; Date: Fri, 26 Feb 1999 16:18:32 -0600; Somewhere I have some Judson literature that claims a HP increase from the stock 43 HP to something like 74 HP with no other mods. I've got a Judson on a Bugeye 948 that I've never run... (it was in; /html/spridgets/1999-02/msg01357.html (8,880 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]