Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Bypass\s+clutched\s+idle\s+reducer\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Bypass\s+clutched\s+idle\s+reducer\?\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Bypass clutched idle reducer? (score: 1): Author: Tab Julius <tab@penworks.com>; Date: Mon, 18 Oct 1999 23:46:38; On my (new!) '78 B, it has one of those "features" that reduces the idle speed when the clutch is depressed, ostensibly to reduce idle emissions (by reducing idle) while you're sitting with the clutc; /html/mgs/1999-10/msg00765.html (7,619 bytes)
2. RE: Bypass clutched idle reducer? (score: 1): Author: Hans Duinhoven <H.Duinhoven@simac.nl>; Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 08:17:12 +0200; Hi Tab, Depressing the clutch puts some stress to the engine in some way. This is very normal for the MGB and propably for many other MG's using the B series engine. So it cannot be reduced or taken; /html/mgs/1999-10/msg00768.html (8,474 bytes)
3. RE: Bypass clutched idle reducer? (score: 1): Author: "Larry Hoy" <larryhoy@prodigy.net>; Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 00:11:24 -0600; I don't have one of those "new fangled" rubber bumper Bs, but I believe you'll find that this is a characteristic of the carbon throw out (release) bearing, and not an emissions reduction feature. La; /html/mgs/1999-10/msg00769.html (8,503 bytes)
4. RE: Bypass clutched idle reducer? (score: 1): Author: James Nazarian Jr <James.Nazarian@Colorado.EDU>; Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 02:43:07 -0600 (MDT); You might try the roller throw out bearing. I am personally very happy with it and I know many others are too. I think that it also aleviates many of the problems with riding the cluch and related is; /html/mgs/1999-10/msg00770.html (9,400 bytes)
5. RE: Bypass clutched idle reducer? (score: 1): Author: Max Heim <mvheim@studiolimage.com>; Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 10:41:13 -0700; Purely anecdotally (no personal experience), but I have heard from several sources that the roller throw out bearing is more prone to trouble than the original style. This seems to be contrary to you; /html/mgs/1999-10/msg00797.html (10,360 bytes)
6. Re: Bypass clutched idle reducer? (score: 1): Author: "Paul Hunt" <paul.hunt1@virgin.net>; Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 14:40:59 +0100; I've never heard it described as an emissions reducer before. It is not compulsory (mine doesn't do it) and is usually caused by the crankshaft thrust-washers having worn, allowing the pressure from; /html/mgs/1999-10/msg00800.html (8,615 bytes)
7. Re: Bypass clutched idle reducer? (score: 1): Author: "Paul Hunt" <paul.hunt1@virgin.net>; Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 19:02:47 +0100; I fitted a roller-bearing last time, and after a few thousand miles it has started 'wittering' just as I take up the free play. I don't know what I was thinking of. Did I really think I would leave t; /html/mgs/1999-10/msg00809.html (11,094 bytes)
8. Re: Bypass clutched idle reducer? (score: 1): Author: Charley & Peggy Robinson <ccrobins@ktc.com>; Date: Wed, 20 Oct 1999 13:02:03 -0500; Hi Paul, I used a ball/roller throwout bearin when I rebuilt my '70 B many years ago. Also put in a compatible heave duty clutch and pressure plate. Sold the car 5 yrs later; had had no probs in the; /html/mgs/1999-10/msg00910.html (7,369 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]