Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Chrome\s+vs\.\s+Rubber\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Chrome\s+vs\.\s+Rubber\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Chrome vs. Rubber (score: 1): Author: "Frank R. Krajewski" <frankk@businesson.com>; Date: Thu, 01 Jan 1998 12:53:04 -0800; I invite anyone who prefers the rubber bumper B to the chrome bumper to test drive my 1964 B with app. 95 stock HP and then my 1980 MGBLE with app. 60 HP(after a good tune up!). Then extol the virtue; /html/mgs/1998-01/msg00007.html (7,366 bytes)
2. Re: Chrome vs. Rubber (score: 1): Author: Chris Delling <saschris@flash.net>; Date: Thu, 01 Jan 1998 14:09:50 -0500; Once we're done thrashing your 64 (hopefully the doors don't fly open ;-) )then you can thrash my 77B, you might be a bit suprised. 9.0 to 1 CR, Piper Cam, re-curved distributor, no smog gear, and a; /html/mgs/1998-01/msg00012.html (7,997 bytes)
3. Re: Chrome vs. Rubber (score: 1): Author: bugeye59@kingsnet.com; Date: Thu, 01 Jan 1998 17:36:46 -0800; The new issue of Thoroughbred and Classic Cars Magazine has a Rubber bumper car on the cover and the feature story "MGB--the smart money is back in rubber!" Just my .02 -- Harris '59 Bugeye Sprite (B; /html/mgs/1998-01/msg00020.html (7,697 bytes)
4. Re: Chrome vs. Rubber (score: 1): Author: Christopher T Palmer <ctp@gbn.org>; Date: Fri, 2 Jan 1998 00:41:12 +0100; That reminds me...I've never known what MOWOG stands for...can anyone tell me? My buddy, the LBC hatin' Mercedes mechanic figures it stands for: More Occlusions Within Our Gears but I doubt he's rig; /html/mgs/1998-01/msg00032.html (7,180 bytes)
5. Re: Chrome vs. Rubber (score: 1): Author: Paul Hunt <paul.hunt1@virgin.net>; Date: Sat, 03 Jan 1998 13:49:20 +0000; OH NO, NOT AGAIN!!; /html/mgs/1998-01/msg00097.html (7,401 bytes)
6. Re: Chrome vs. Rubber (score: 1): Author: Paul Hunt <paul.hunt1@virgin.net>; Date: Sat, 03 Jan 1998 11:50:11 +0000; You're confusing the effects of the rubber bumpers with the effects of the (US) smog controls. PaulH.; /html/mgs/1998-01/msg00099.html (7,599 bytes)
7. Re: Chrome vs. Rubber (score: 1): Author: gofastmg@juno.com (Rick Morrison); Date: Sat, 03 Jan 1998 22:00:42 EST; On Sat, 03 Jan 1998 13:46:35 +0000 Paul Hunt <paul.hunt1@virgin.net> TABLE SAW TYPE SNIP Hey Paul The UK doesn't have a monopoly on stupid snobbery. On this side of the Atlantic pond, we have a large; /html/mgs/1998-01/msg00136.html (8,195 bytes)
8. Re: Chrome vs. Rubber (score: 1): Author: "Scott Gardner" <gardner7@pilot.infi.net>; Date: Sun, 4 Jan 1998 00:28:29 +0000; Rick, Your post struck a chord with me. When I bought my '72, I didn't know much about MGBs, other than there were hardtops and softtops, and that there were rubber and chrome bumpers. At the time,; /html/mgs/1998-01/msg00144.html (8,935 bytes)
9. Re: Chrome vs. Rubber (score: 1): Author: Paul Hunt <paul.hunt1@virgin.net>; Date: Sun, 04 Jan 1998 15:08:17 +0000; Only if they are stuffed in the carb intakes.; /html/mgs/1998-01/msg00170.html (7,971 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]