Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Current\s+Samples\s+in\s+our\s+Scientific\s+research\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Current\s+Samples\s+in\s+our\s+Scientific\s+research\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. Current Samples in our Scientific research (score: 1): Author: Editorgary@aol.com; Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 00:57:49 EDT; As of the end of #1708, the count was Six users with no bad experiences Two users with bad experiences Any more data points to be offered? Cheers Gary; /html/healeys/2006-05/msg00620.html (6,862 bytes)
2. Re: Current Samples in our Scientific research (score: 1): Author: "Alan Seigrist Blue 100" <healey.nut@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 14:46:49 +0800; ONLY 1 out of 3 with a bad experience. sounds like the satisfaction surveys for the 1979 International Scout II !!! Cheers, Alan; /html/healeys/2006-05/msg00622.html (7,258 bytes)
3. Re: Current Samples in our Scientific research (score: 1): Author: Douglas W Flagg <dwflagg@juno.com>; Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 10:34:46 -0400; Maybe, instead of an "Under The Canopy" column or an entire page devoted to another Healey club, we could have an "Under the Bonnet" column where we can discuss after market products and our persona; /html/healeys/2006-05/msg00627.html (8,279 bytes)
4. Re: Current Samples in our Scientific research (score: 1): Author: "jwbn6@netzero.net" <jwbn6@netzero.net>; Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 16:11:08 GMT; add you and me and that makes 8 so by an overwhelming margin of 4 to 1, the KOOLER will take its rightful place along with EDDIE & THE CRUISERS !!; /html/healeys/2006-05/msg00631.html (6,967 bytes)
5. Re: Current Samples in our Scientific research (score: 1): Author: Douglas W Flagg <dwflagg@juno.com>; Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 20:11:29 -0400; It seems to me a sad commentary when, someone such as Rich, to whom we all turn for technical expertise, asks the list about some possibilities for "things might we have enough of a need for, maybe t; /html/healeys/2006-05/msg00870.html (11,073 bytes)
6. Re: Current Samples in our Scientific research (score: 1): Author: "Len and/or Marge" <thehartnetts@earthlink.net>; Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 17:49:23 -0700; Doug: I have checked back in my e-mail files and I find no copy of Rich's e-mail. Is it possible that you were the only one that received it? Perhaps a review of the N/A items in the catalogs might b; /html/healeys/2006-05/msg00872.html (12,432 bytes)
7. Re: Current Samples in our Scientific research (score: 1): Author: Bob Haskell <rchaskell@earthlink.net>; Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 21:00:14 -0400; I didn't receive Rich's email. Would you check the headers and confirm that it went to healeys@autox.team.net? Curious. Here are few items; I've talked with Craig about some ... 1) The D washer that; /html/healeys/2006-05/msg00873.html (9,788 bytes)
8. Re: Current Samples in our Scientific research (score: 1): Author: "Rich C" <richchrysler@quickclic.net>; Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 21:39:32 -0400; Hi Bob, I did indeed send that note to the list but somehow some got it while others did not. Good list. You mention the 5/8" grommet. They all need to be reviewed and compared to originals. Current; /html/healeys/2006-05/msg00874.html (10,721 bytes)
9. Re: Current Samples in our Scientific research (score: 1): Author: "Rich C" <richchrysler@quickclic.net>; Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 21:45:04 -0400; Len wrote<snip> Yes, this would be a good start. Also there is a lot of reproduction crap out there that hopeful folks spend good money on and can't use it, or if they can it isn't really correct. I; /html/healeys/2006-05/msg00875.html (8,838 bytes)
10. Re: Current Samples in our Scientific research (score: 1): Author: "Greg Lemon" <glemon@neb.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 21:44:11 -0500; The repro park/headlight switches for 100s (maybe early sixes as well) are crap, I have talked to others with similar experiences to mine, seems a simple item to get right, but mine left me without l; /html/healeys/2006-05/msg00877.html (8,419 bytes)
11. Re: Current Samples in our Scientific research (score: 1): Author: "Alan Seigrist Blue 100" <healey.nut@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 11:30:27 +0800; The BN1 gearbox in many respects is superior to the later 4 speed box, save for the 3rd gear problem. If a replacement gearset and synchros were available using modern, stronger materials, i'm sure; /html/healeys/2006-05/msg00879.html (12,228 bytes)
12. Re: Current Samples in our Scientific research (score: 1): Author: Roland Wilhelmy <rwil@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 21:18:03 -0700; It sounds reasonable to me, even the complete set if that would be less costly than jigging up for three different 3rd gears. You could put me down for one or two. -Roland '53 BN1 with 3 sp that will; /html/healeys/2006-05/msg00881.html (9,312 bytes)
13. Re: Current Samples in our Scientific research (score: 1): Author: "Rich C" <richchrysler@quickclic.net>; Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 08:16:27 -0400; The only answer so far is to save and reuse the panel bulb holders from the old harness. beyond that, new sockets are available but are expensive. In fact I never throw the old harness away untill e; /html/healeys/2006-05/msg00888.html (8,449 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]