Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*DMV\s+hassles\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*DMV\s+hassles\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. DMV hassles (score: 1): Author: ritchie@mcn.org (Armand & Lorie Ritchie); Date: Wed, 14 May 1997 16:52:48 -0700; Anyone have a problem with the calif. dmv on trying to change the date on you regis. Our tiger's regis. states first regis. in 65 year model 66. But according to the vin number B9470219 it was built; /html/tigers/1997-05/msg00210.html (7,491 bytes)
2. Re: DMV hassles (score: 1): Author: richards@northcoast.com; Date: Wed, 14 May 1997 19:11:53 -0700; Ritchie-My Tiger is of the same inaccurate DMV pigeonhole. Even so, a "67" Tiger is only required to have a PCV valve and the hydrocarbons and CO percentages are quite high. Of course I only have to; /html/tigers/1997-05/msg00215.html (8,347 bytes)
3. Re: DMV hassles (score: 1): Author: Allan Connell <alcon@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 14 May 1997 19:49:33 -0700; Armand, I am in California and the PO of my '65 Tiger was smart enough to have it petitioned and changed. Apparently this was common in the middle 60's to register "first sold" date and can be change; /html/tigers/1997-05/msg00221.html (9,842 bytes)
4. Re: DMV hassles (score: 1): Author: Roland Dudley <cobra@cdc.hp.com>; Date: Thu, 15 May 97 7:23:51 PDT; If you live in one of the Bay Area counties you gotta smog every two years. Roland; /html/tigers/1997-05/msg00235.html (7,868 bytes)
5. Re: DMV hassles (score: 1): Author: Dave McDermott <Dave.McDermott@cusys.edu>; Date: Thu, 15 May 1997 09:11:19 -0600; A friend of mine owned a Rootes dealership back in the 60's and I asked him recently how it was that there were so many mismatches between the actual year of manufacture vs. the dates on titles. Acco; /html/tigers/1997-05/msg00238.html (11,374 bytes)
6. Re: DMV hassles (score: 1): Author: Steve Laifman <laifman@flash.net>; Date: Thu, 15 May 1997 18:33:00 +0100; In the early days of the foreign car business ('49 and on) there was a distinct practice by American manufacturers to have a NEW model every year. The NEW model came out in September. No sneak looks.; /html/tigers/1997-05/msg00247.html (9,565 bytes)
7. Re: DMV hassles (score: 1): Author: Bill Rogers <milward@gte.net>; Date: Thu, 15 May 1997 18:52:45 -0700; We have B9472703, it is a '65 and was registered as a '66. I asked DMV to correct this error about 8 years ago and they sent me to the California Highway Patrol (Oxnard). I took the car, documents an; /html/tigers/1997-05/msg00248.html (9,225 bytes)
8. Re: DMV hassles (score: 1): Author: CoolVT@aol.com; Date: Fri, 16 May 1997 00:19:19 -0400 (EDT); Think you have a problem with production date, huh? My car was titled and registered as a "Roote". When I purchased, the DMV insisted that it be registered under the same brand name shown on the bill; /html/tigers/1997-05/msg00250.html (8,140 bytes)
9. Re[2]: DMV hassles (score: 1): Author: nicholsj@oakwood.org; Date: Fri, 16 May 97 09:13:17 EST; In Michigan my Tiger is titled as a 'Rootes 66'. I went to the DMV to buy tabs. The clerk behind the counter looked at my registration and laughed. He asked if my car was named after the old T.V. sho; /html/tigers/1997-05/msg00253.html (8,640 bytes)
10. Re: DMV hassles (score: 1): Author: Roland Dudley <cobra@cdc.hp.com>; Date: Fri, 16 May 97 13:12:03 PDT; About a year after I bought the Cobra the company I worked for transfered me to Arlington Virginia. Since Virginia plates were cheaper I figured it would be a good idea to register my car there even; /html/tigers/1997-05/msg00261.html (10,308 bytes)
11. Re: DMV hassles (score: 1): Author: Harold Hartsell <Hartsell@thegrid.net>; Date: Fri, 16 May 1997 15:26:35 -0700; I had to go through 4 visits to the DMV to register my car when I bought it a few years back. The clerk also attempted to take my black plates, which became another fiasco. Harold; /html/tigers/1997-05/msg00263.html (8,432 bytes)
12. Re[2]: DMV hassles (score: 1): Author: LeBrun@hii.hitachi.com; Date: Fri, 16 May 97 15:39:08 PST; -I thought I was lucky in being able to use AAA (A3) instead of DMV. NOT! Boy, what a difference in office personnel/policy adherence/level of competence! -Our TIGER was sold, and returned back to t; /html/tigers/1997-05/msg00264.html (9,175 bytes)
13. Re: DMV hassles (score: 1): Author: Allan Connell <alcon@earthlink.net>; Date: Fri, 16 May 1997 16:57:41 -0700; Interesting. When I bought my car from the PO, rather than standing in line, I deposited all of the paperwork in the appropriate envelope and put it in their drop off box. Contrary to all other trans; /html/tigers/1997-05/msg00265.html (9,314 bytes)
14. Re: DMV hassles (score: 1): Author: steven malone <s_malone@metro.net>; Date: Fri, 16 May 1997 23:07:36 -0700; I've had my share of extra trips to the D.M.V. over the decades. This last year I bought a TR3 that was last registered in 1983. It was no longer in D.M.V.'s computer, so I needed to get the I.D. tag; /html/tigers/1997-05/msg00270.html (8,186 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]