Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Dual\s+master\s+cylinder\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Dual\s+master\s+cylinder\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Dual master cylinder (score: 1): Author: Gary Tash <tashg@bmi.net>; Date: Tue, 02 May 2000 19:14:38 -0700; Yes, the value of emergency brakes. I remember driving around Seattle one winter in my TR3 with nothing but the emergency brake, and a good mental map of hills and traffic patterrns, and not much goo; /html/spitfires/2000-05/msg00093.html (8,755 bytes)
2. Re: Dual master cylinder (score: 1): Author: Barry Schwartz <bschwart@pacbell.net>; Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2000 06:16:51 -0700; While it's admirable to want to upgrade braking, especially for safety reasons, I for one don't see why one would want to convert to a more complex system. ESPECIALLY one that in my own experience is; /html/spitfires/2000-04/msg01104.html (8,494 bytes)
3. Re: Dual master cylinder (score: 1): Author: "Jeff McNeal" <jmcneal@ohms.com>; Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2000 07:46:03 -0700; The one thing with the tandem master system that I sort of like and wish I could have with my single line braking system is the hydraulic pressure warning lamp that lets you know that unless your eme; /html/spitfires/2000-04/msg01106.html (10,269 bytes)
4. Re: Dual master cylinder (score: 1): Author: Douglas Braun & Nadia Papakonstantinou <dougnad@bellatlantic.net>; Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2000 13:09:04 -0400; Most modern cars I have examined seem to have ditched the PDWA concept, and use a fluid level switch(es) in the MC reservoir. I guess one could rig up something for the Spitfire, but personally, I ha; /html/spitfires/2000-04/msg01112.html (7,946 bytes)
5. Re: Dual master cylinder (score: 1): Author: "Jeff McNeal" <jmcneal@ohms.com>; Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2000 12:53:09 -0700; Doug, Maybe that's because you enjoy the safety net of a dual reservoir braking system. The level warning switch would be a marvelous safety device for those of us with '67 and earlier Spitfires. I; /html/spitfires/2000-04/msg01120.html (8,426 bytes)
6. Re: Dual master cylinder (score: 1): Author: Gospitt@aol.com; Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2000 22:55:05 EDT; What does PDWA mean..?; /html/spitfires/2000-04/msg01131.html (7,046 bytes)
7. Re: Dual master cylinder (score: 1): Author: Andrew Mace <amace@unix2.nysed.gov>; Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2000 23:26:56 -0400 (EDT); Pressure Differential Warning Actuator. --Andy * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Andrew Mace e-mail: amace@unix2.nysed.gov * * * * Mrs Irrelevant: Oh, is it a je; /html/spitfires/2000-04/msg01132.html (7,671 bytes)
8. RE: Dual master cylinder (score: 1): Author: "Larry Griffin" <lgriffin@Prodigy.net>; Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2000 21:31:14 -0400; Barry Schwartz wrote on Thursday, April 27, 2000 9:17 AM: Barry, I've missed the beginning of this thread and apologize in advance it we are not talking about a dual master cylinder as on a 68 Spit.; /html/spitfires/2000-04/msg01213.html (8,921 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]