Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Engine\s+overhaul\s+update\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Engine\s+overhaul\s+update\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Engine overhaul update (score: 1): Author: "Navarrette, Vance" <vance.navarrette@intel.com>; Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2004 21:45:16 -0800; Latest on reassembling the new engine for the 6. I have the engine basically back together, but narrowly avoided making a couple of significant mistakes. First near miss, I started putting the pisto; /html/6pack/2004-01/msg00032.html (11,136 bytes)
2. RE: Engine overhaul update (score: 1): Author: Ryan Miles <rjhmile@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2004 09:32:12 -0800 (PST); Vance and others, I don't really know but, are you sure it is ok to install the rod caps backwards even if they have been machined that way? I am only asking this because when the rods are machined i; /html/6pack/2004-01/msg00039.html (6,930 bytes)
3. Re: Engine overhaul update (score: 1): Author: "Greg Dito" <dito9561@bellsouth.net>; Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2004 13:16:17 -0500; My understanding about the rod cap orientation is that the angled cut on one side of each cap is for clearance to the block during rotation. If they were reversed there would not be enough clearance; /html/6pack/2004-01/msg00043.html (7,433 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]