Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Fuel\s+injected\s+TR\'s\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Fuel\s+injected\s+TR\'s\?\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Fuel injected TR's? (score: 1): Author: "Sean Johnson" <sean_johnson@milacron.com>; Date: Fri, 10 Nov 1995 11:25:36 -0700; I was reading a book on collector cars the other day. It said that Euro-spec TR6's had fuel injection, while U.S.-spec cars got carbs, largely due to the increased cost of FI. They also quoted 140hp; /html/triumphs/1995-11/msg00362.html (7,461 bytes)
2. Re: Fuel injected TR's? (score: 1): Author: thompson@ridgeback.East.Sun.COM (Keith B. Thompson - Sun); Date: Fri, 10 Nov 1995 13:37:54 -0500; hi, i know that the TR250 was that way. in the u.s. it was carburated, in europe it was P.I. (petrol injected, and it was also called a TR5). kbt; /html/triumphs/1995-11/msg00363.html (8,462 bytes)
3. Re: Fuel injected TR's? (score: 1): Author: "Doug Mitchell" <dmitchel@ford.com>; Date: Fri, 10 Nov 1995 13:56:50 -0500 "Fuel injected TR's?" (Nov 10, 1:22pm); Yes, the TR6 had PI (petrol injection) in the UK. I am not sure about any other markets, although I tend to think that the Federalized cars were the only ones not to be injected. Remember, the majori; /html/triumphs/1995-11/msg00369.html (8,358 bytes)
4. Re: Fuel injected TR's? (score: 1): Author: ArthurK101@aol.com; Date: Fri, 10 Nov 1995 17:41:43 -0500; The TR5 was the 6 cylinder fuel injected follow-on to the TR4 and 4A's (same chassis with some body and interior styling changes) - but at that time the U.S. EPA was beginning to tighten up on pollut; /html/triumphs/1995-11/msg00372.html (8,280 bytes)
5. Re: Fuel injected TR's? (score: 1): Author: "Kurt Oblinger" <Kurt_Oblinger_at_AWP450@mail.hq.faa.gov>; Date: Fri, 10 Nov 95 17:51:54 EST; Hi Sean, Petrol injection as it was known was first offered on the home market TR5 (US got carbs and the name TR250) as far as I know PI was offered through the entire model span of the TR6 but never; /html/triumphs/1995-11/msg00380.html (8,831 bytes)
6. Re: Fuel injected TR's? (score: 1): Author: gbott@yarrow.wt.com.au (Geoff Bott); Date: Sat, 11 Nov 1995 21:08:18 +0800; As already stated in anumber of other replies to these questions, the TR5 and TR6 were released in the US as carburetted versions only. Fuel injection was omitted because of emission control regulat; /html/triumphs/1995-11/msg00392.html (8,306 bytes)
7. Re: Fuel injected TR's? (score: 1): Author: Bill Sohl Budd Lake <billsohl@planet.net>; Date: Sat, 11 Nov 1995 13:23:30 -0700; This is a continuing myth that periodically comes up anytime PI is discussed. The fact is that the PI TR-5 and TR-6 would have had no problem meeting the emissions specs of the day. The problem as vi; /html/triumphs/1995-11/msg00402.html (9,096 bytes)
8. Re: Fuel injected TR's? (score: 1): Author: John Wroclawski <jtw@lcs.mit.edu>; Date: Sun, 12 Nov 1995 17:35:17 -0500; The TR5 was the 6 cylinder fuel injected follow-on to the TR4 and 4A's (same chassis with some body and interior styling changes) - but at that time the U.S. EPA was beginning to tighten up on pollut; /html/triumphs/1995-11/msg00425.html (8,026 bytes)
9. Re: Fuel injected TR's? (score: 1): Author: ArthurK101@aol.com; Date: Sun, 12 Nov 1995 23:30:23 -0500; John, Maybe! U quoted Piggott - I think that's where I read it. Anyway, for whatever reason, the facts are that the TR5 was not imported to the U.S. because of the PI --the 250 was -- and so that is; /html/triumphs/1995-11/msg00431.html (7,600 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]