Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*HEALEY\s+NAME\s+$brand$\s+SELLS\s+FOR\s+MORE\s+THAN\s+\$1\,750\.000\.00\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*HEALEY\s+NAME\s+$brand$\s+SELLS\s+FOR\s+MORE\s+THAN\s+\$1\,750\.000\.00\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. HEALEY NAME (brand) SELLS FOR MORE THAN $1,750.000.00 (score: 1): Author: "62bt7" <62bt7@prodigy.net>; Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 23:54:38 -0800; Well Now, Boys and Girls, Since this information was basicly posted to the list last Saturday, (without dollar figures) I have seen only two emails related to the British press article, (both) announ; /html/healeys/2006-01/msg01060.html (8,050 bytes)
2. Re: HEALEY NAME (brand) SELLS FOR MORE THAN $1,750.000.00 (score: 1): Author: Bob Spidell <bspidell@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2006 06:50:37 -0800; That's a pretty condescending post, not what I'd expect from you. Anyway, I find it hard to get worked up about this one way or another. For one thing, the List has hashed this topic ("new Healey"); /html/healeys/2006-01/msg01063.html (9,088 bytes)
3. Re: HEALEY NAME (brand) SELLS FOR MORE THAN $1,750.000.00 (score: 1): Author: tammie wall <whammie@iopener.net>; Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 14:14:15 -0600; /html/healeys/2006-01/msg01072.html (10,107 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]