Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*NOT\s+In\s+Defense\s+of\s+Rpilfold\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*NOT\s+In\s+Defense\s+of\s+Rpilfold\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: NOT In Defense of Rpilfold (score: 1): Author: Matt Murray <mattm@optonline.net>; Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2001 12:01:42 -0500; Regardless of Mr. REPilfold's views of Jean's posts, pro or con, (or someone else's posts about the Evo Schools :^) ), his lack of real signature or name ID is what irked me. Say it proud say it loud; /html/autox/2001-03/msg00255.html (8,988 bytes)
2. Re: NOT In Defense of Rpilfold (score: 1): Author: Hottvr@aol.com; Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2001 17:16:55 EST; << I am glad to read that he does contribute to his local club. I was hoping it wasn't David Stamm in disguise (anybody actually ever meet him?). >> Matt I think I have??? Doesn't that guy drive an e; /html/autox/2001-03/msg00258.html (7,111 bytes)
3. Re: NOT In Defense of Rpilfold (score: 1): Author: REPilfold@aol.com; Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2001 17:55:53 EST; My sincere apologies for that. It was not intended. I just plain forgot to tack it on the end. As you get older it may happen to you too :-) Richard E. Pilfold; /html/autox/2001-03/msg00259.html (6,795 bytes)
4. Re: NOT In Defense of Rpilfold (score: 1): Author: "Tom Holt" <tholt@ccsi.com>; Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2001 20:50:07 -0600; That was David Stamman... He's relatively harmless... Tom -- Original Message -- From: <Hottvr@aol.com> To: <mattm@optonline.net>; <autox@autox.team.net> Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2001 4:16 PM Subje; /html/autox/2001-03/msg00262.html (7,694 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]