Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Neat\!\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Neat\!\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. Neat! (score: 1): Author: Mark J Bradakis <mjb@autox.team.net>; Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2000 23:46:48 -0600 (MDT); Saturday afternoon I should have dashed home, fired up Killer, backed down the drive and then returned to the garage. That way, I could have claimed to have driven three of my Triumphs in one day. I; /html/fot/2000-10/msg00041.html (8,206 bytes)
2. Re: Neat! (score: 1): Author: Joe Curry <spitlist@gte.net>; Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 07:18:54 -0700; How do you get away with the Webers on a D Production autocross car? The way I read the rule book, the only carbs you can use in that class are SU's and Stromberg's (on a Spit that is). This is one; /html/fot/2000-10/msg00042.html (8,917 bytes)
3. Re: Neat! (score: 1): Author: Mark J Bradakis <mjb@cs.utah.edu>; Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 10:06:07 -0600 (MDT); How do you get away with the Webers on a D Production autocross car? I don't. The red car runs a pair of 1 1/2" SUs. mjb.; /html/fot/2000-10/msg00046.html (7,174 bytes)
4. Re: Neat! (score: 1): Author: Joe Curry <spitlist@gte.net>; Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 09:51:46 -0700; OK, But what class do you run the yellow car in? Joe (C); /html/fot/2000-10/msg00047.html (7,383 bytes)
5. Re: Neat! (score: 1): Author: Mark J Bradakis <mjb@cs.utah.edu>; Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 11:25:24 -0600 (MDT); Killer, the yellow car I had in Portland, usually runs in Street Prepared. It isn't quite legal yet, as the interior isn't finished. At VTR we ran in the prepared class due to the missing interior bi; /html/fot/2000-10/msg00049.html (7,477 bytes)
6. Re: Neat! (score: 1): Author: Joe Curry <spitlist@gte.net>; Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 10:38:58 -0700; Ok, That brings me back to my original question regarding carbs. When I was doing my research on classes prior to building Tiny Tim, I found that the only Spitfire class that allows other than ZS and; /html/fot/2000-10/msg00050.html (7,981 bytes)
7. Re: Neat! (score: 1): Author: Bob Lang <LANG@isis.mit.edu>; Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 14:31:06 -0400 (EDT); Street Prepared allows any form of carb or fuel injection. This is also summarized as: external engine mods are "free". So, you can't run a cam in SP (FSP for the Spitfire), but you can run Webers. N; /html/fot/2000-10/msg00053.html (8,903 bytes)
8. Re: Neat! (score: 1): Author: Joe Curry <spitlist@gte.net>; Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 11:45:59 -0700; I guess then that I am a bit confused by the ambiguity f the SCCA rules. Here's why: The Prepared class for Spitfires (which is supposed to be higher performance that Street Prepared) only allows the; /html/fot/2000-10/msg00054.html (7,952 bytes)
9. Re: Neat! (score: 1): Author: Bob Lang <LANG@isis.mit.edu>; Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 15:00:17 -0400 (EDT); This is correct. This is the same as the Production road race clasees, GP for the top two and FP for the bottom one. Apparently, this is a performance equalization issue. Join the club. Put the Weber; /html/fot/2000-10/msg00055.html (8,850 bytes)
10. Re: Neat! (score: 1): Author: Joe Curry <spitlist@gte.net>; Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 14:03:01 -0700; DCOEs are in place and the DM lettering is on the car. As soon as I get Ted's clutch, I'll be able to play a little. If you want to see what the car looks like, see the following: http://www.driveab; /html/fot/2000-10/msg00058.html (9,893 bytes)
11. Re: Neat! (score: 1): Author: rjl6n@cstone.net (R. John Lye); Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 21:18:07 -0400; That's great! Now you've got more than one running Triumph at the same time! <grin> R. John Lye rjl6n@cstone.net; /html/fot/2000-10/msg00063.html (7,633 bytes)
12. Re: Neat! (score: 1): Author: rjl6n@cstone.net (R. John Lye); Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 21:29:10 -0400; Hi Joe, Mark and Bob, Also, be aware that VTR rules are similar to, but not the same as the SSCA rules. <grin> Cheers, R. John Lye rjl6n@cstone.net; /html/fot/2000-10/msg00065.html (7,555 bytes)
13. Re: Neat! (score: 1): Author: rjl6n@cstone.net (R. John Lye); Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 21:42:08 -0400; Hi Joe, Well, the quick answer is that we're talking about the SCCA (it's not supposed to make sense - sorry, I spent way too much time in impound at the Runoffs - like 12-14 hours!). The real answer; /html/fot/2000-10/msg00066.html (8,081 bytes)
14. Re: Neat! (score: 1): Author: Joe Curry <spitlist@gte.net>; Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 19:08:19 -0700; What??? The VTR has Autocross rules??? :) (Those who were at Portland this year will understand this comment!) Joe (C); /html/fot/2000-10/msg00068.html (7,587 bytes)
15. Re: Neat! (score: 1): Author: Herald948@aol.com; Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 22:48:04 EDT; Joe, I understand all too well what you're trying to say. But please don't blame VTR for the, er, lack of proper structure at the Portland (OR) autocross. VTR rules are very well thought out and very; /html/fot/2000-10/msg00071.html (8,123 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 15
Page: [1]