Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Ok\,\s+A\s+TR6\s+Question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Ok\,\s+A\s+TR6\s+Question\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. Ok, A TR6 Question (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 23:05:18 -0500; Been looking over the Net and I've seen some nice TR6s. I also have a buyers guide which mentions that the better cars are the pre 1971. What would make these better than say a 1972 - 1974? Also, I'v; /html/triumphs/2002-02/msg00703.html (7,395 bytes)
2. Re: Ok, A TR6 Question (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 22:35:00 -0800; I think this becomes more a matter of opinion, LeRoy. However, it's been my experience that just about no matter what kind of car your looking for, whether it's a Corvette, a 240Z, Triumph, MG or wh; /html/triumphs/2002-02/msg00712.html (10,951 bytes)
3. Re: Ok, A TR6 Question (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 09:38:15 -0500; Message text written by LeRoy Price buyers guide which mentions that the better cars are the pre 1971. What would make these better than say a 1972 - 1974? < That sounds like somebody's opinion to me; /html/triumphs/2002-02/msg00724.html (9,793 bytes)
4. Re: Ok, a TR6 Question (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2002 08:56:04 EST; The best TR6 every made was the '71, why? because that was the shiney new car I was driving when I met my wife. Owning one of these beasts is an emotional experience and has nothing to do with commo; /html/triumphs/2002-02/msg00807.html (7,641 bytes)
5. Re: Ok, a TR6 Question (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2002 12:47:37 -0500; "Better find a good mechanic since these cars are high maintenance" Ok, is this truth or another one of those old storys floating around? I know these had some poor quality issues when they were made; /html/triumphs/2002-02/msg00818.html (7,567 bytes)
6. Re: Ok, a TR6 Question (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2002 13:06:14 EST; IMO, it's far more "story/legend" than fact. True, compared to a brand-new 2002 model, with oil changes every 7500 miles, virtually no chassis lubrication and spark plug changes only every 100,000 mi; /html/triumphs/2002-02/msg00819.html (9,003 bytes)
7. Re: Ok, a TR6 Question (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2002 13:27:12 -0500; Well, it required very little maintenance. The only thing I did with it was put new hoses on and grease and oil. The issue was that it really wasn't a cruiser in any stretch of the imagination. This; /html/triumphs/2002-02/msg00821.html (7,952 bytes)
8. Re: Ok, a TR6 Question (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2002 15:22:30 -0500; I agree with Andy. Triumphs are not your average automobile, which is to say, yes, they are "owner intensive." They do require the owner to be aware of a few maintenance intervals and how the car is; /html/triumphs/2002-02/msg00825.html (9,695 bytes)
9. Re: Ok, a TR6 Question (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2002 08:50:18 -0500; I agree totally, John. Your '71 and my '76. I could drive your '71 but then I'd be afraid my car would feel jilted. Jeff Johnson '76 TR6 /// triumphs@autox.team.net mailing list /// To unsubscribe se; /html/triumphs/2002-02/msg00853.html (7,957 bytes)
10. Re: Ok, a TR6 Question (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2002 14:03:51 -0600 21, 2001) at 02/17/2002 02:03:53 PM, Serialize complete at 02/17/2002 02:03:53 PM, Itemize by SMTP Server on SMTPMTA1/i2Tech(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at 02/17/200; I owned an old classic Mustang convertible as well as several TR6s over the years. Interestingly enough, the Ford Mustang was more of a pain in the a** than the TR6s ever were. Including electrical p; /html/triumphs/2002-02/msg00868.html (8,418 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]