Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*PCV\s+needed\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*PCV\s+needed\?\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. PCV needed? (score: 1): Author: Ric Otte <otte@cats.ucsc.edu>; Date: Wed, 2 Jun 1999 07:22:43 -0700; I've been reading the messages about crankcase ventilation, PCV valves, holes in oil fill caps, and am now completely confused. I have a 1275 (12CD-DA-H 9590) and simply have a hose coming from the; /html/spridgets/1999-06/msg00089.html (9,045 bytes)
2. Re: PCV needed? (score: 1): Author: "Andy Webster" <trunkie@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 02 Jun 1999 15:31:02 GMT; I have a 63 mkII sprite with no pollution crud and, what I believe to be, its original pcv system intact. It consists of a stiff hose coming 6 inches vertically up from the centre of the intake manif; /html/spridgets/1999-06/msg00096.html (10,513 bytes)
3. Re: PCV needed? (score: 1): Author: Ulix Goettsch <ulix@u.washington.edu>; Date: Wed, 2 Jun 1999 08:37:24 -0700 (PDT); A PCV system would definitely help to reduce your rear oil leak. I saw it on my car first hand. It will not hurt performance. SInce the original PCV valve is hard to find, you may want to adapt a di; /html/spridgets/1999-06/msg00099.html (10,636 bytes)
4. Re: PCV needed? (score: 1): Author: Ronsoave@aol.com; Date: Wed, 2 Jun 1999 11:56:25 EDT; On the advice of a highly respected race engine builder / mechanical engineer, I left my cap closed, with leak-free success. Based on a post by Peter Samaroo, I then instead used an unconnected (on m; /html/spridgets/1999-06/msg00100.html (8,072 bytes)
5. RE: PCV needed? (score: 1): Author: Phil Vanner <pvanner@pclink.com>; Date: Wed, 2 Jun 1999 10:58:24 -0500; That sounds like the PCV set-up from a '67 1275. Your '63 shouldn't have an oil separator on the front cover if it has the original engine. If it has a '67 1275, that's a good thing, in my opinion. P; /html/spridgets/1999-06/msg00104.html (11,002 bytes)
6. Re: PCV needed? (score: 1): Author: "Andy Webster" <trunkie@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 02 Jun 1999 16:23:34 GMT; My brother tells me that pcv, i.e sucking the crankcase vapours through the combustion chambers lowers the octane of the charge burnt...I don't know how true this is, I use my pcv, It's just that you; /html/spridgets/1999-06/msg00106.html (11,521 bytes)
7. Re: PCV needed? (score: 1): Author: "Wiedemeyer" <boxweed@thebest.net>; Date: Wed, 2 Jun 1999 15:20:37 -0400; If your '63 has this type of PCV, it ain't original, or it ain't a '63. ('63s have a 1098cc engine with mechanical fuel pump and a hose going from the valve cover to the front air cleaner only. No ot; /html/spridgets/1999-06/msg00134.html (8,549 bytes)
8. Re: PCV needed? (score: 1): Author: Andy Webster <trunkie@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 03 Jun 1999 01:38:55 GMT; I know that it's not the original motor. as the engine # 10CCDAHxxxxx preferable to the 10CG though, did the later 1100's have the pcv that I described? Andy; /html/spridgets/1999-06/msg00165.html (9,259 bytes)
9. Re: PCV needed? (score: 1): Author: "Wiedemeyer" <boxweed@thebest.net>; Date: Wed, 2 Jun 1999 22:42:03 -0400; Yes, from '64 to '66, all the 1098cc engines had the PCV that you described. Bob --Original Message-- From: Andy Webster <trunkie@hotmail.com> To: boxweed@thebest.net <boxweed@thebest.net> Cc: spridg; /html/spridgets/1999-06/msg00177.html (8,051 bytes)
10. Re: PCV needed? (score: 1): Author: "Guy" <Guy@weller-lakes.freeserve.co.uk>; Date: Thu, 3 Jun 1999 06:17:48 +0100; Now that depends on where in the world you are. My UK spec '71 has a cylindrical oil seperator on the timing gear cover (front cover?) and then a simple pipe going to a "Y" shaped connector feeding d; /html/spridgets/1999-06/msg00202.html (12,596 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]