Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Patch\s+panels\s+vs\.\s+complete\s+panel\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Patch panels vs. complete panel (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 1997 07:36:14 -0700
Just finished installing (fitting) a lower rear quarter, right hand, front, patch panel on the project ’70 Spitfire. Almost finished with the entire panel replacement, YEAH!!! I've yet to replace the
/html/triumphs/1997-08/msg01256.html (7,173 bytes)

2. Re: Patch panels vs. complete panel (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 1997 05:45:06 -0400 (EDT)
<< Subj: Patch panels vs. complete panel Date: 97-08-18 11:24:46 EDT From: bschwartz@encad.com (Barry Schwartz) Sender: owner-triumphs@autox.team.net Reply-to: bschwartz@encad.com (Barry Schwartz) To
/html/triumphs/1997-08/msg01389.html (8,040 bytes)

3. Re[2]: Patch panels vs. complete panel (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: 20 Aug 1997 15:13:03 -0400
I chose the "replace the whole thing" route after watching the local shop try to fit a "aptch" panel to the rear wing of his personal GT-6...the patch was lousey both fit and function...and the resul
/html/triumphs/1997-08/msg01459.html (10,957 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu