Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Rods\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Rods\?\s*$/: 17 ]

Total 17 documents matching your query.

1. Rods? (score: 1): Author: "Jack W. Drews" <vinttr4@geneseo.net>; Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 11:00:52 -0500; Has anyone tried the rods made by companies other than Carillo? Opinions and comments? uncle jack; /html/fot/2005-08/msg00197.html (6,970 bytes)
2. Re: Rods? (score: 1): Author: "Joe Boruch" <jaboruch@netzero.net>; Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 17:28:27 GMT; I have 2 sets of Pauter TR3/4 rods and they are great, but they have been a little heavier than Carrillos. I have been trying to get them to cut the weight down. They said maybe next time I order som; /html/fot/2005-08/msg00199.html (7,591 bytes)
3. RE: Rods? (score: 1): Author: "barry rosenberg" <britcars@bellsouth.net>; Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 13:52:26 -0400; What do the Carrillo TR4 rods weigh? My Crowers weigh in at 766 grams each; that is 538 rotating and 228 reciprocating. Just curious. Barry; /html/fot/2005-08/msg00200.html (7,309 bytes)
4. Re: Rods? (score: 1): Author: <triumph_marx@freenet.de>; Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 20:09:04 +0200; My reworked standard rods weight in at 857grams. Chris; /html/fot/2005-08/msg00201.html (7,583 bytes)
5. RE: Rods? (score: 1): Author: "Jack W. Drews" <vinttr4@geneseo.net>; Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 13:29:44 -0500; The spec sheet for my Carillos says 479 rotating, 186 reciprocating, 665 total. Some time ago when I wanted to replace two rods rather than a whole set, they couldn't do it because of either a change; /html/fot/2005-08/msg00202.html (7,755 bytes)
6. Re: Rods? (score: 1): Author: "John W" <john@race-dogs.com>; Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 14:19:48 -0700; I've used Pauter rods and had great success 8,000 rpm plus- About Half the cost of Carrillo'sThey were also the only ones to actually list a Triumph on their site John W. Spitfire #892 DP 240z CP3; /html/fot/2005-08/msg00212.html (7,807 bytes)
7. Re: Rods? (score: 1): Author: "Brad Kahler" <brad.kahler@141.com>; Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 17:14:50 -0500; We bought Pauter rods for Susan's spitfire. Nice looking and seem to be working just fine in the car. The major issue we had with them is on one of the rods they stamped the cap and the rod, then tu; /html/fot/2005-08/msg00214.html (8,798 bytes)
8. RE: Rods? (score: 1): Author: "Joe Boruch" <jaboruch@netzero.net>; Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 03:56:16 GMT; The Carrillos that I had were 668 Total, 483 Rotating and 185 Reciprocating. The Last Pauters that I bought are 699 Total and 506 Big End (rotating). Joe(B); /html/fot/2005-08/msg00216.html (7,747 bytes)
9. RE: Rods? (score: 1): Author: "SHANE Ingate" <hottr6@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 11:01:48 -0400; I weighed my TR6 Carillos and they came to 443 grams (each), +/- 1.5 grams. With the JE pistons (290 grams), the total saving in weight is 370 grams over the stock rod/Hepolite piston. Shane Ingate i; /html/fot/2005-08/msg00220.html (7,777 bytes)
10. RE: Rods? (score: 1): Author: "barry rosenberg" <britcars@bellsouth.net>; Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 12:18:31 -0400; Compare your TR6 rods to a TR4's. Ours are almost twice the size. Wish the TR6 would work in a TR4. And with such small rods and pistons, why do they say a TR6 will not live at much over 6,800 rpm or; /html/fot/2005-08/msg00223.html (7,855 bytes)
11. RE: Rods? (score: 1): Author: "SHANE Ingate" <hottr6@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 12:27:42 -0400; The low rpms of the TR6 is due to its rubber-band crankshaft. There are nasty resonances at around 6200, and then again at 7800 (I think). A billet-steel crank eliminates that, and the you can wind; /html/fot/2005-08/msg00224.html (8,159 bytes)
12. Re: Rods? (score: 1): Author: "kas kastner" <kaskas@cox.net>; Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 12:50:33 -0700; With the TR-6 it is not the rods (although they could use some help) but it is the crankshaft. It has no overlap and thus it whips around and has a terrible harmonic right where you want to race the; /html/fot/2005-08/msg00232.html (8,109 bytes)
13. Re: Rods? (score: 1): Author: "kas kastner" <kaskas@cox.net>; Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 12:54:54 -0700; I had an expensive independent engineering firm do a survey of the TR-6 crankshaft in about 1969 or 1970. Their recommendation was that nitride treatment to the crank would improve the strength (liva; /html/fot/2005-08/msg00233.html (8,485 bytes)
14. Re: Rods? (score: 1): Author: "SHANE Ingate" <hottr6@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 16:09:11 -0400; I had my crank nitrided and then polished, and then sent it out to be cross-drilled. Uh-oh, no go. Wrong order. Oh well, next time I'll get it right. Sigh. Shane Ingate in Maryland; /html/fot/2005-08/msg00234.html (7,523 bytes)
15. Re: Rods? (score: 1): Author: emanteno@comcast.net; Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 20:06:15 +0000; -- Original message -- Did you have the survey done before or after you measured the 5/8" flex of the crank at the flywheel? Irv; /html/fot/2005-08/msg00235.html (7,665 bytes)
16. Re: Rods? (score: 1): Author: "john price" <jprice1@txcyber.com>; Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 17:52:51 -0500 (CDT); Kas says the Tr-6 has a crankshaft harmonic at 6200 rpm. I believe it. My redline is set at 6000. John Price it is terrible Wish do; /html/fot/2005-08/msg00236.html (8,150 bytes)
17. Re: Rods? (score: 1): Author: matt matthews <mattspit@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 20:17:30 -0500; I bought Crower rods for my 1500 spit in part because they could put 5/16 bolts in them while Carillo could not. only 1/4. So far so good.; /html/fot/2005-08/msg00239.html (9,200 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 17
Page: [1]