Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*SO\s+Class\?\?\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*SO\s+Class\?\?\?\s*$/: 20 ]

Total 20 documents matching your query.

1. SO Class??? (score: 1): Author: Paul Foster <pfoster@gdi.net>; Date: Tue, 13 Apr 1999 10:43:00 -0400; KK ripostes: <<<I think the S.O. class is long overdue, especially as we enter the new millenium.>>> So let me see if I understand this. If you are slower than your SO then you _have_ to run in the S; /html/autox/1999-04/msg00712.html (7,310 bytes)
2. Re: SO Class??? (score: 1): Author: scott_phelps@england.gdt1.com; Date: Tue, 13 Apr 99 10:56:00 -0500; What about having a SOL class......... ;^) For those of us who either have less than desirable cars, can't drive, or <shudder> BOTH! Scott Phelps TLS #11 88 Yugo GVX EP; /html/autox/1999-04/msg00716.html (7,397 bytes)
3. RE: SO Class??? (score: 1): Author: "Kelly, Katie" <kkelly@spss.com>; Date: Tue, 13 Apr 1999 10:19:13 -0700; Paul Foster writes... No, no, you don't HAVE to run in the SO class. It is entirely up to you where you run, just as it is now. Only now, we are offering this choice to males who, for whatever reason; /html/autox/1999-04/msg00737.html (7,892 bytes)
4. RE: SO Class??? (score: 1): Author: Karl Witt <kwitt@shore.net>; Date: Tue, 13 Apr 1999 13:30:14 -0400; On or about 10:19 AM 4/13/1999 -0700, Kelly, Katie did say: Great idea! however, the name seems to be throwing the biggest monkey wrench in the works, so how about a new name? I was sitting here thin; /html/autox/1999-04/msg00741.html (8,012 bytes)
5. RE: SO Class??? (score: 1): Author: "Kelly, Katie" <kkelly@spss.com>; Date: Tue, 13 Apr 1999 10:45:04 -0700; We couldn't call the SO class NOVICE. Is the Ladies class NOVICE? I don't think so! You'll find some of the BEST drivers in Ladies classes. K Katie Kelly Technical Publications SPSS Bay Area (510)412; /html/autox/1999-04/msg00743.html (9,119 bytes)
6. RE: SO Class??? (score: 1): Author: Craig Blome <cblome@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 13 Apr 1999 10:45:59 -0700 (PDT); I've heard rumors that SWDiv may be including novice classes at divisionals this season (or perhaps street tire, my brain was fairly fried at the Tour!) Neat idea, though enforcing the experience lev; /html/autox/1999-04/msg00744.html (8,254 bytes)
7. Re: SO Class??? (score: 1): Author: "Justin Hughes" <ka1ult@channel1.com>; Date: Tue, 13 Apr 1999 14:03:26 -0400; Well, what do we call it, then? "Other?" "None of the above?" Or how about one of Chong's (as in "Cheech and") brilliant moments: "It's like the same thing, only different, man..." :) From the sound; /html/autox/1999-04/msg00745.html (8,607 bytes)
8. RE: SO Class??? (score: 1): Author: Karl Witt <kwitt@shore.net>; Date: Tue, 13 Apr 1999 13:58:20 -0400; On or about 10:45 AM 4/13/1999 -0700, Kelly, Katie did say: Point taken, after you last mail and this one I see what you're getting at. The other mails in this thread have taken it as a lower competi; /html/autox/1999-04/msg00747.html (8,342 bytes)
9. RE: SO Class??? (score: 1): Author: "Kelly, Katie" <kkelly@spss.com>; Date: Tue, 13 Apr 1999 11:01:15 -0700; Justin Hughes writes... See, that's IT! Nothing changes! It's just a new name! And NO, it's not like TLS or TSOL. Those are seperate entities in which I have no significant interest. K Katie Kelly Te; /html/autox/1999-04/msg00749.html (9,859 bytes)
10. Re: SO Class??? (score: 1): Author: "Justin Hughes" <ka1ult@channel1.com>; Date: Tue, 13 Apr 1999 14:15:43 -0400; Well, if nothing changes, and it's a new name, then what's the point? There has to be SOME difference for it to be worth having. Something like competitive/non-competitive. Those who are in it to wi; /html/autox/1999-04/msg00752.html (8,760 bytes)
11. Re: SO Class??? (score: 1): Author: Mike Bultemeier <hottvr@tfs.net>; Date: Tue, 13 Apr 1999 13:17:08 -0500; My opinion is that there shouldn't be Ladies or a Novice class. Everybody steps on the gas peddle the same way. I see no reason for seperate classes. Look at what happened at last years Nationals. Th; /html/autox/1999-04/msg00754.html (8,913 bytes)
12. Re: SO Class??? (score: 1): Author: Paul Foster <pfoster@gdi.net>; Date: Tue, 13 Apr 1999 15:12:53 -0400; Whew, that's a relief! Now I can start dating again without the fear of being relegated to the SO class! And Jeff Reitmeier doesn't have to worry that he may someday need a divorce to run AS. But tha; /html/autox/1999-04/msg00761.html (8,954 bytes)
13. RE: SO Class??? (score: 1): Author: "Kelly, Katie" <kkelly@spss.com>; Date: Tue, 13 Apr 1999 12:20:22 -0700; Paul Foster writes... Well, you are correct. It DOES sound like a form of discrimination, but now it's a VOLUNTARY form of discrimination. Katie Katie Kelly Technical Publications SPSS Bay Area (510); /html/autox/1999-04/msg00764.html (10,211 bytes)
14. Fw: SO Class??? (score: 1): Author: "Bruce Sargent" <bruces@caspers.net>; Date: Tue, 13 Apr 1999 18:30:48 -0600; What Novice? The idea of a Novice Class is to allow newcomers a place to learn until a set factor is accomplished. We used to have a TYRO class for people to run in as long as they didn't start beati; /html/autox/1999-04/msg00786.html (10,201 bytes)
15. Re: SO Class??? (score: 1): Author: dg50@daimlerchrysler.com; Date: Wed, 14 Apr 1999 10:28:31 -0400; I'm gonna weigh in with my $0.03 CAN here, everything IMHO: 1) At the Regional/Local level, anything that increases the level of participation or in some way improves the experience of the existing p; /html/autox/1999-04/msg00817.html (10,096 bytes)
16. Re: SO Class??? (score: 1): Author: "elizabeth banha" <enzo_b@email.msn.com>; Date: Wed, 14 Apr 1999 12:05:07 -0400; Hi DG(?) Here's my 2 cents.... No physical difference between the sexes?!!!!! My husband John is 6'2" and 225lbs! He's a mechanic with forearms like Popeye!!! Take a look at the national results over; /html/autox/1999-04/msg00823.html (8,282 bytes)
17. RE: SO Class??? (score: 1): Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>; Date: Thu, 15 Apr 1999 11:05:39 -0400 (EDT); Wait... you were serious about this? Then I've got a suggestion. Just have a novice class. This "SO" and "Ladies" etc. stuff all boils down to giving people that are starting out or aren't very comp; /html/autox/1999-04/msg00885.html (7,911 bytes)
18. Re: SO Class??? (score: 1): Author: rikracer <rikracer@cwix.net>; Date: Thu, 15 Apr 1999 09:31:54 -0700; speed This makes sense to me. I know several regions have novice programs. Cal Club has for some time and the class is always well subscribed. In our version, you run with your regular class, but on; /html/autox/1999-04/msg00892.html (8,839 bytes)
19. Re: SO Class??? (score: 1): Author: dg50@daimlerchrysler.com; Date: Thu, 15 Apr 1999 09:13:48 -0400; Well, because now you've split the classes in half. Instead of "B Stock Open" and "B Stock Ladies" you've effectively created "B Stock A" and "B Stock B". If there's no technical difference between t; /html/autox/1999-04/msg00925.html (9,050 bytes)
20. Re: SO Class??? (score: 1): Author: "Phil Ethier" <pethier@isd.net>; Date: Thu, 15 Apr 1999 19:08:16 -0500; No. It's sex. "Gender" is a linguistic differentiator. It is not a satisfactory substitute for "sex". Then again, what is? Phil Ethier Saint Paul Minnesota USA Lotus Europa, VW Quantum Syncro, Chev; /html/autox/1999-04/msg00929.html (7,641 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1]