Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Senate\s+AB2683\s+analysis\s+\-\s+perspective\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Senate\s+AB2683\s+analysis\s+\-\s+perspective\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Senate AB2683 analysis - perspective (score: 1): Author: "tom felts" <tomfelts@earthlink.net>; Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 08:11:48 -0400; Hey guys--as they say religion, politics, and environment do not mix--expecially on the Healey list. You, as most of us, are passionate about the world we live in--just wonder if this is the place to; /html/healeys/2004-07/msg00003.html (7,077 bytes)
2. Re: Senate AB2683 analysis - perspective (score: 1): Author: "Keith Turk" <kturk@ala.net>; Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 07:33:40 -0500; Oh come on Tom.... ( snickering here ) what ya thinking... I love it when folks talk about politic's and religion.... it's always a dang hoot.... The people not sharing my particular views are just s; /html/healeys/2004-07/msg00006.html (7,259 bytes)
3. Fw: Senate AB2683 analysis - perspective (score: 1): Author: healeyolic <healey6@optonline.net>; Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 09:11:13 -0400; This entire thread reminds me of a controversary years ago when I owned a boat and there was a movement to prohibit the dumping of human waste overboard from small boats (I had a 22 footer with a por; /html/healeys/2004-07/msg00007.html (7,197 bytes)
4. Re: Senate AB2683 analysis - perspective (score: 1): Author: Dave & Marlene <rusd@velocitus.net>; Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 07:38:49 -0600; You are probably right. Environment fits the definition of a religion. Dave Russell; /html/healeys/2004-07/msg00010.html (7,168 bytes)
5. Re: Senate AB2683 analysis - perspective (score: 1): Author: bn1@pacbell.net; Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 18:53:25 -0700; Thank you, Len, and this is my last comment on the subject. Currently there is a lot of political pressure on our new "Govenator" to change the Mexican truck limitation. (I will not comment on the or; /html/healeys/2004-07/msg00028.html (9,970 bytes)
6. Re: Senate AB2683 analysis - perspective (score: 1): Author: Dave & Marlene <rusd@velocitus.net>; Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 00:37:25 -0600; There are other ligitimate points of view on CO2/global warming. Here is one: http://www.clearlight.com/~mhieb/WVFossils/greenhouse_data.html I guess that it depends on the horse you wish to support; /html/healeys/2004-06/msg00628.html (8,645 bytes)
7. Re: Senate AB2683 analysis - perspective (score: 1): Author: Blue One Hundred <international_investor@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 00:52:16 -0700 (PDT); I have known about this for some time - it started a while back with the study about the affect of vapor trails left in the sky by jet planes... those vapor trails actually have a significant affect; /html/healeys/2004-06/msg00629.html (10,149 bytes)
8. Re: Senate AB2683 analysis - perspective (score: 1): Author: "M.E. & E.A. Driver" <edriver@sasktel.net>; Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 13:38:47 -0600; Hi Fellows Maybe all those concerned, and those not concerned with this issue should spend several or more hours reading "Respect for nature: a theory of environmental ethics" by P.W. Taylor publishe; /html/healeys/2004-06/msg00641.html (9,584 bytes)
9. Re: Senate AB2683 analysis - perspective (score: 1): Author: bn1@pacbell.net; Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 18:09:32 -0700; You didn't, perhaps, see the movie THE DAY AFTER TOMORROW, did you? Asbestos is on, let the flames begin! And yes, it will be argued forever! Bill Barnett Santa Ana, CA '53 BN1 # 663 & the exempt '72; /html/healeys/2004-06/msg00647.html (9,128 bytes)
10. Re: Senate AB2683 analysis - perspective (score: 1): Author: Eric (Rick) Wilkins <wilko2@cox.net>; Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 18:21:03 -0700; Even though the true effects of man's contraptions on the earth can't really be measured or predicted with absolute values, you can't be saying car smog is GOOD for the environment?! Rick San Diego; /html/healeys/2004-06/msg00648.html (7,542 bytes)
11. Re: Senate AB2683 analysis - perspective (score: 1): Author: bn1@pacbell.net; Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 19:22:41 -0700; NOPE! Not at all. All I wish to do is be able to drive my Healey when ever I want. I also wish to be able to commute to my employment in my '72 240Z. That's all! To me, that doesn't seem like much.; /html/healeys/2004-06/msg00651.html (8,367 bytes)
12. Re: Senate AB2683 analysis - perspective (score: 1): Author: "Len and/or Marge" <thehartnetts@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 22:18:53 -0700; I agree with Bill B. Of course we don't think SMOG is good for the environment. But taking away our LBCs wouldn't be good for our dispositions, either. And I haven't heard anyone mention the economic; /html/healeys/2004-06/msg00654.html (10,873 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]