Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Social\s+Darwinisn\s+\(NO\s+LBC\)\:\s+WAS\s+Re\[2\]\:\s+Regarding\s+Ed\'s\s+proxy\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Social Darwinisn (NO LBC): WAS Re[2]: Regarding Ed's proxy? (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 01:10:35 -0500
Hello Leo, Leo, Social Darwinism and the Supreme court? Sounds like it could be interesting. Is that anything like my theory or "Reverse Darwinism" or "Reverse Evolution"? My hypothesis is that the U
/html/spridgets/2002-01/msg00099.html (8,860 bytes)

2. Re: Social Darwinisn (NO LBC): WAS Re[2]: Regarding Ed's proxy? (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 11:46:54 -0500
Does this explain why you get lost when rallying? Enquiring mi-- never mind! Sorry couldn't let that one pass :>P Biff Jones Pasadena, MD '59 Bugeye, 'Kermit' '62 Sprite, 'Ole Gray' '71 Midget, 'Fre
/html/spridgets/2002-01/msg00152.html (10,560 bytes)

3. Re: Social Darwinisn (NO LBC): WAS Re[2]: Regarding Ed's proxy? (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2002 16:23:13 -0500
And I thought I was the only person who "observed" that. For the past 30 years I have been saying we are creating a country full of useless whimps. Bill just put his name to my observation and since
/html/spridgets/2002-01/msg00202.html (8,424 bytes)

4. Re: Social Darwinisn (NO LBC): WAS Re[2]: Regarding Ed's proxy? (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2002 18:06:52 +0000 FILETIME=[96B92880:01C1954A]
"believe", not "belive", and "effect" (n), not "affect" (v). _________________________________________________________________ /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or t
/html/spridgets/2002-01/msg00264.html (7,279 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu