Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TR250\s+Amber\s+\&\s+Red\s+Lens\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TR250\s+Amber\s+\&\s+Red\s+Lens\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. TR250 Amber & Red Lens? (score: 1): Author: TR250Driver@aol.com; Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 09:58:31 EDT; A subject of some debate even for the TR4's. To make matters even more confusing there were actually two different types of the amber & red lens. The difference being in the pattern of the amber por; /html/triumphs/2005-10/msg00326.html (7,459 bytes)
2. RE: TR250 Amber & Red Lens? (score: 1): Author: "Steinman, Bill" <wsteinman@pogolaw.com>; Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 11:00:31 -0400; Darrell raises an interesting issue. I too am now befuddled. :o) I've received a couple of emails off-list from original owners who indicate that they have never changed the lenses on their tail lamp; /html/triumphs/2005-10/msg00328.html (7,899 bytes)
3. RE: TR250 Amber & Red Lens? (score: 1): Author: "Steinman, Bill" <wsteinman@pogolaw.com>; Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 11:48:01 -0400; Following up on my prior email, here are the data points I have so far from original owners: CD5068L -- Red/Red CD8124L -- Amber/Red I'm CD8464L with Amber/Red, but I'm at least the third owner, so I; /html/triumphs/2005-10/msg00329.html (7,822 bytes)
4. Re: TR250 Amber & Red Lens? (score: 1): Author: TR250Driver@aol.com; Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 13:51:41 EDT; CD 4421 LO RED/RED Hey, I looked it up the Official Triumph Spare Parts Catalog and both types are listed so since all 8484 TR250's were US Market cars I bet ya both types were used. I also think tha; /html/triumphs/2005-10/msg00330.html (7,195 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]