Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Timing\s+Chain\s+Single\/Double\s+\?\s+MGB\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Timing\s+Chain\s+Single\/Double\s+\?\s+MGB\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. Timing Chain Single/Double ? MGB (score: 1): Author: Bud Krueger <bkrueger@ici.net>; Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2000 14:24:52 -0500; Opinions please? I'm in the act of rebuilding the 18V engine in my 77B. The option of reverting to a double row timing chain keeps coming up. The goal of the rebuild is reliable commuting for the nex; /html/mgs/2000-11/msg00991.html (7,790 bytes)
2. Re: Timing Chain Single/Double ? MGB (score: 1): Author: "Lawrie Alexander" <Lawrie@britcars.com>; Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2000 13:16:58 -0800; Logic says the double-row chain should last longer but one has to remember that the factory would not have made the change to a single-row chain if they expected it to fail within a noticeably short; /html/mgs/2000-11/msg00993.html (8,930 bytes)
3. Re: Timing Chain Single/Double ? MGB (score: 1): Author: JustBrits@aol.com; Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2000 17:34:34 EST; Bud: IMVHO, double. See reply to Lawrie<G>!! Cheers............. Diplomat Ed; /html/mgs/2000-11/msg00995.html (7,995 bytes)
4. Re: Timing Chain Single/Double ? MGB (score: 1): Author: JustBrits@aol.com; Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2000 17:32:51 EST; Lawrie: Sorry, but you are using your British Logic not BMC Logic. Motor became "cheaper" to production line build. Therefore, (sorry again<G>), I disagree. Cheers............. Ed; /html/mgs/2000-11/msg00996.html (8,182 bytes)
5. Re: Timing Chain Single/Double ? MGB (score: 1): Author: "Lawrie Alexander" <Lawrie@britcars.com>; Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2000 15:07:15 -0800; That doesn't counter the fact that, although they found a single-row set-up cheaper, they would not have introduced it unless they felt it could last, at the very least, the 50K miles that the EPA te; /html/mgs/2000-11/msg00999.html (9,667 bytes)
6. RE: Timing Chain Single/Double ? MGB (score: 1): Author: "Thomas Pokrefke" <pokrefke1@home.com>; Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2000 18:33:45 -0600; --Original Message-- (From Lawrie to Ed) "That's what business is all about. Aren't you in business to make a profit?" I think Ed's in business to see naked women and drink beer. He just picked the w; /html/mgs/2000-11/msg01001.html (8,204 bytes)
7. Re: Timing Chain Single/Double ? MGB (score: 1): Author: JustBrits@aol.com; Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2000 19:28:08 EST; And your POINT is, Thomas?????????????????????????????????????????? Let he whom lives with TWO beautiful women CAST the FIRST stone!!!!! <G> Ed; /html/mgs/2000-11/msg01002.html (8,243 bytes)
8. Re: Timing Chain Single/Double ? MGB (score: 1): Author: Bud Krueger <bkrueger@ici.net>; Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2000 21:09:48 -0500; I was hoping that responders would give some logical reason for their opinion. Is yours only that it was cheaper? -- Bud Krueger http://home.ici.net/~bkrueger/ 52TD 77MGB; /html/mgs/2000-11/msg01005.html (8,480 bytes)
9. Re: Timing Chain Single/Double ? MGB (score: 1): Author: Barney Gaylord <barneymg@ntsource.com>; Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2000 01:28:31 -0600; opinion. Is yours only that it was cheaper? Well here's some logic. I believe in keep it simple and keep it cheap. I also believe that the single row timing set used as in the original setup will get; /html/mgs/2000-11/msg01008.html (9,007 bytes)
10. Re: Timing Chain Single/Double ? MGB (score: 1): Author: Charley & Peggy Robinson <ccrobins@ktc.com>; Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2000 02:04:19 -0600; When I rebuilt my B engine last winter, I replaced both sprockets and the chain. I used the double-row components because I'm convinced that they'll last longer than the single row parts. The cost d; /html/mgs/2000-11/msg01009.html (8,846 bytes)
11. Re: Timing Chain Single/Double ? MGB (score: 1): Author: Larry Macy <macy@bblmail.psycha.upenn.edu>; Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2000 06:50:27 -0500; Well I do!!! However, one is my daughter ;-) Larry Larry Macy 78 Midget Keep your top down and your chin up. Larry B. Macy, Ph.D. macy@bblmail.psycha.upenn.edu System Manager/Administrator Neuropsych; /html/mgs/2000-11/msg01010.html (9,126 bytes)
12. RE: Timing Chain Single/Double ? MGB (score: 1): Author: Joe Short <buster_balz@operamail.com>; Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2000 09:44:39 -0500; No matter what you do, if you are rebuilding the engine, it would be foolish and risky not to replace the timing chain and gears. The decision to go with a double or single row chain is up to you. Fo; /html/mgs/2000-11/msg01012.html (8,992 bytes)
13. Re: Timing Chain Single/Double ? MGB (score: 1): Author: WSpohn4@aol.com; Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2000 10:49:02 EST; Have to disagree here, Lawrie. It was quiet simply, all about money. They would indeed have used less rugged parts, and no doubt made a suitable change to their maintenance schedule, if it would save; /html/mgs/2000-11/msg01018.html (8,846 bytes)
14. Re: Timing Chain Single/Double ? MGB (score: 1): Author: Charley & Peggy Robinson <ccrobins@ktc.com>; Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2000 10:44:36 -0600; OOPS, the prices I quoted were from an old catalogue. The latest Moss catalogue is a bit different. Now it's a difference of $7.75, with the double-row parts still the cheapest. There was a big drop; /html/mgs/2000-11/msg01019.html (7,911 bytes)
15. Re: Timing Chain Single/Double ? MGB (score: 1): Author: Carl Elliott <grunt2@adelphia.net>; Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2000 17:05:09 -0500; Good Thinking ,Never thought of the double spring and the extra pressure on the Gears or Chain. Will have to do some looking into it as last year I replaced my head with an early model Double spring.; /html/mgs/2000-11/msg01025.html (9,186 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 15
Page: [1]