Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Tire\s+Circumference\s+\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Tire\s+Circumference\s+\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Tire Circumference ? (score: 1): Author: flarsen@uclink.berkeley.edu (Flemming Larsen); Date: Sun, 14 Nov 93 23:39:26 -0800; I apologize if this is something that I ought'a know, or if it is a FASQ (Frequently Asked Stupid Question), but what is the nominal circumference of a 165-13 tire (tyre)? How much does this dimensio; /html/british-cars/1993-11/msg00271.html (8,615 bytes)
2. Re: Tire Circumference ? (score: 1): Author: phile@stpaul.gov (Philip J Ethier); Date: Mon, 15 Nov 1993 09:54:01 -0600 (CST); Generally, when a size is given with no aspect ratio designation, the aspect ratio is 80%, or perhaps 78%. I think that 165-13 implies a ratio of 80%. Here are specs for various 165 tires via the for; /html/british-cars/1993-11/msg00274.html (9,270 bytes)
3. Re: Tire Circumference ? (score: 1): Author: TJ_Jerome@tallysys.com; Date: 16 Nov 93 13:28; and Phil Ethier replies >> And my 2 cents is: My S3 Elan had its front wheel arches damaged by running 155SR13 tires. On full right or left lock and under bump conditions (easily achieved by turning; /html/british-cars/1993-11/msg00319.html (7,737 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]