Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*U\-joint\s+lubrication\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*U\-joint\s+lubrication\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. U-Joint Lubrication (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1998 16:55:32 -0700; I've just finished rebuilding my rear axles (phew - what a job!). I put new u-joints on and the u-joints (from TRF) have a little grease nipple. Problem is, there isn't enough clearance between the n; /html/triumphs/1998-09/msg01585.html (6,567 bytes)
2. Re: U-Joint Lubrication (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1998 21:56:27 -0400; There are all different kinds of zirk fittings available from your local auto parts guy. My U-Joints ('80 Spit) came with zirks of about 1-1/2" in length. During normal operation, I kept a set screw; /html/triumphs/1998-09/msg01595.html (7,854 bytes)
3. Re: U-Joint Lubrication (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1998 08:39:34 -0400charset="iso-8859-1"; I concur - I installed the same type U-joints on my 72 Spit when I rebuilt the half shafts last year. My U-joints actually came with the set screws already in place and the zerk extension plugs to us; /html/triumphs/1998-09/msg01619.html (8,420 bytes)
4. U-joint lubrication (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Tue, 11 Nov 1997 22:08:31; Learned Listers, As I get my Spitfire closer to being roadworthy, I was wondering about the universal joints. The car was sitting in the PO's lawn for seven years, and while all the u-joints SEEM ok; /html/triumphs/1997-11/msg00808.html (7,246 bytes)
5. Re: U-joint lubrication (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Tue, 11 Nov 1997 18:27:46 -0800; Atwell, If you are in a position to do so, I would suggest removal of all 4 U-Joints. If they have set up several years, it's a good bet that they are at least dried up. If that is the case, They may; /html/triumphs/1997-11/msg00809.html (9,069 bytes)
6. Re: U-joint lubrication (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 12 Nov 1997 22:03:51 -0800; Here's a couple more cents on this topic. For my money, there is no better mechanical repair deal than the one I get from a drivetrain shop when they do my u-joints. I was there just this week, in fa; /html/triumphs/1997-11/msg00882.html (9,981 bytes)
7. Re: U-joint lubrication (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 12 Nov 1997 22:04:31 -0800; Here's a couple more cents on this topic. For my money, there is no better mechanical repair deal than the one I get from a drivetrain shop when they do my u-joints. I was there just this week, in fa; /html/triumphs/1997-11/msg00883.html (10,008 bytes)
8. Re: U-joint lubrication (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 12 Nov 1997 20:24:23 -0800; -- I've replaced the grease fittings on my U-joints with allen-hex Set Screws (Home Depot). They make it much easier to get out later, because the plug/screw is "stuck" on the end of the allen wrench; /html/triumphs/1997-11/msg00888.html (8,079 bytes)
9. Re: U-joint lubrication (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 12 Nov 1997 23:57:09 -0600; Or you can get them from British Parts North West at about $12 each. That's where I got mine. Larry Zink 1964 Spitfire4 Houston; /html/triumphs/1997-11/msg00897.html (9,721 bytes)
10. Re: U-joint lubrication (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 12 Nov 1997 23:59:59 -0800; Larry, I got mine at "the local cheapie Auto parts Store" that's Al's here in WA. for $9.99 ea. I had to pay tax but no shipping. Joe Curry; /html/triumphs/1997-11/msg00899.html (7,943 bytes)
11. RE: U-joint lubrication (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 13 Nov 1997 13:46:43 -0700; <snip> One thing about the BPNW u-joints. They are definitely not the same as the original ones on my TR6 were. I think OEM are Hardy Spicer which is apparently THE brand for u-joints. The ones I go; /html/triumphs/1997-11/msg00928.html (8,600 bytes)
12. Re: U-joint lubrication (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 13 Nov 1997 15:10:08 -0600; I've used multiple sets from BPNW, the Spicer ones. The engineers on the list can probably answer this better than I, but I would think that smaller needles equals more surface area and larger bearin; /html/triumphs/1997-11/msg00930.html (9,826 bytes)
13. RE: U-joint lubrication (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 13 Nov 1997 14:08:14 -0700; Yeah I thought the same thing at first.. but then why do the bearings in your trans for example use large balls instead of more small ones? (I don't know but just want to illustrate that perhaps the; /html/triumphs/1997-11/msg00931.html (8,518 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]