Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*advance\s+ignition\s+timing\s+3000\s+MK1\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*advance\s+ignition\s+timing\s+3000\s+MK1\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. advance ignition timing 3000 MK1 (score: 1): Author: "tnewton" <timnewton@menziesgroup.com.au>; Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 07:05:50 +1000; Hi to all I am sure this has been covered to death over time, but could some one please confirm a couple of details regarding ignition timing. What is the general consensus on how much advance seems; /html/healeys/2005-05/msg00832.html (7,706 bytes)
2. Re: advance ignition timing 3000 MK1 (score: 1): Author: John Miller <healeys@n4vu.com>; Date: Sun, 29 May 2005 17:34:54 -0400; Please don't take this as gospel, but just another data point: with an engine of this vintage, provided the vacuum and centrifugal advances are working, the correct timing is the point at which you c; /html/healeys/2005-05/msg00833.html (8,322 bytes)
3. RE: advance ignition timing 3000 MK1 (score: 1): Author: "Michael Salter" <msalter@precisionsportscar.com>; Date: Sun, 29 May 2005 18:15:44 -0400; Although many people use this method I have a good publication from Repco, of Repco Brabham fame, which suggests that this is not too wise as the over advance may not be apparent and can cause cranks; /html/healeys/2005-05/msg00835.html (9,219 bytes)
4. Re: advance ignition timing 3000 MK1 (score: 1): Author: John Peak <redbn7@yahoo.com>; Date: Sun, 29 May 2005 15:47:25 -0700 (PDT); While the book says 5 Degrees BTC, what you are really shooting for is proper full advance. With a 45 year old distributor you are likely dealing with an advance mechanism that is not working to ori; /html/healeys/2005-05/msg00837.html (8,776 bytes)
5. Re: advance ignition timing 3000 MK1 (score: 1): Author: "Bob Johnson" <robert.w.johnson@adelphia.net>; Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 12:02:48 -0400; OK, how do you make sure that the vacuum and centrifugal advance are working correctly? Also, how much "play" is acceptable in a distributor drive shaft? These are questions that have been on my mind; /html/healeys/2005-05/msg00854.html (9,155 bytes)
6. Re: advance ignition timing 3000 MK1 (score: 1): Author: "Bob Spidell" <bspidell@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 10:00:21 -0700; re: Get an advance meter (a timing light with the ability to dial-in any advance value). Then check total advance against the book (there might be some intermediate values you can check but I'm too; /html/healeys/2005-05/msg00864.html (8,532 bytes)
7. Re: advance ignition timing 3000 MK1 (score: 1): Author: John Miller <healeys@n4vu.com>; Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 13:30:25 -0400; To see if they're working at all, you can use a timing light. Without the vacuum advance connected, see if you're getting advance with increasing RPMs (centrifugal). Then, with a hand vacuum pump + t; /html/healeys/2005-05/msg00866.html (7,829 bytes)
8. Re: advance ignition timing 3000 MK1 (score: 1): Author: Dave & M <rusd@velocitus.net>; Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 15:30:39 -0600; Hi Bob, The vacuum advance comes from a "ported vacuum" source. This means that the vacuum takeoff point on the carb is slightly downstream (outboard) of the throttle butterfly. There is no vacuum on; /html/healeys/2005-05/msg00907.html (11,505 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]