Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*suppliers\s+of\s+parts\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*suppliers\s+of\s+parts\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. suppliers of parts (score: 1): Author: Eric Houkal <erictw@mcs.net>; Date: Sat, 20 Apr 1996 14:46:50 -0500 (CDT); At the risk of starting a huge controversy, I am compelled to ask (before I send all my money down the proverbial pipe) other MG people to relate their experiences with 1. Victoria British, 2. Specia; /html/mgs/1996-04/msg00602.html (7,350 bytes)
2. Re: suppliers of parts (score: 1): Author: David Councill <dcouncil@imt.net>; Date: Sat, 20 Apr 1996 14:13:09 -0600; Huge controversy? It will take more than this. I presume the "other places" would be: Moss Motors 800-667-7872 good source, inexpensive Roadster Factory 800-678-8764 best in quality but it costs more; /html/mgs/1996-04/msg00603.html (8,468 bytes)
3. Re: suppliers of parts (score: 1): Author: macleodm@cadvision.com (Michael MacLeod); Date: Fri, 19 Apr 1996 14:58:51 -0600; I have had mixed experiences with all of the above. Generally I have found them to be roughtly equivalent. Some rules of thumb. Asian parts are seriously lacking quality. Although I did buy the inte; /html/mgs/1996-04/msg00606.html (9,780 bytes)
4. Re: suppliers of parts (score: 1): Author: drded@ix.netcom.com (David Deutsch); Date: Sat, 20 Apr 1996 14:51:43 -0700; Well we're back to suppliers again. I'm game here we go: Special Interest Car Parts have the best interior packages in quality and price. Moss and Vic Brit are the same as far as I'm concerned so you; /html/mgs/1996-04/msg00607.html (7,878 bytes)
5. Re: suppliers of parts (score: 1): Author: jello@dns.ida.net (Phil Bates); Date: Sat, 20 Apr 1996 18:28:30 -0600; I have to defend British Miles here. I have gotten several very hard to get parts through them. And their prices are no more unreasonable than Moss or Victoria British for the relatively common part; /html/mgs/1996-04/msg00613.html (8,879 bytes)
6. Re: suppliers of parts (score: 1): Author: "Glen R. Wilson" <railroad@itw.com>; Date: Sat, 20 Apr 1996 20:50:21 -0400; I agree 1000% with David on the following two suppliers. First: Second: I've dealt with both more than once. Glen Wilson; /html/mgs/1996-04/msg00614.html (7,548 bytes)
7. Re: suppliers of parts (score: 1): Author: Roe <proe@suffolk.lib.ny.us>; Date: Sun, 21 Apr 1996 08:11:18 -0400 (EDT); I tend to agree with David on British Miles, had a bad experience with them & will share it with those who write me. Phil...; /html/mgs/1996-04/msg00625.html (9,366 bytes)
8. Re:Suppliers of parts (score: 1): Author: BDurgin1@aol.com; Date: Sun, 21 Apr 1996 11:49:33 -0400; Not to belabor a point, but I've also had bad experience with British Miles. I believe that one of the benefits of this hobby is the trust I've developed with suppliers and others involved in these c; /html/mgs/1996-04/msg00635.html (7,128 bytes)
9. Re:Suppliers of parts (score: 1): Author: Bill D <billd@doa.net>; Date: Sun, 21 Apr 1996 17:42:52 -0400 (EDT); Not to belabor another point, but I can't say enough *good* things about British Racing Green here in Delaware. Couldn't keep my car on the road were it not for Jim Knight and Stan Corbit (Stan's the; /html/mgs/1996-04/msg00642.html (7,710 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]