Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*weber\s+question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*weber\s+question\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. weber question (score: 1): Author: "Barry" <cen70394@centurytel.net>; Date: Wed, 1 May 2002 18:29:33 -0500; I'm considering installing the two barrel weber carb on my '73 MGB. I would like to know what thoughts list members have on this conversion. If you have installed this carb, I'd like to hear from you; /html/mgs/2002-05/msg00020.html (7,562 bytes)
2. Re: weber question (score: 1): Author: "Bill Meyer" <wcameyer@msn.com>; Date: Wed, 1 May 2002 16:45:12 -0700; Here we go again!! Many opinions. Mine is, from experience, stick with SU's - MUCH better carbs. Bill /// or try http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool /// Archives at http://www.team.net/archive; /html/mgs/2002-05/msg00022.html (7,553 bytes)
3. Re: weber question (score: 1): Author: Charles & Peggy Robinson <ccrobins@ktc.com>; Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 08:26:06 -0500; This is an opinion backed by experience. If the Weber carb kit is new, you should have no problems, providing your dizzy matches the kit and the engine is in good shape. I put a new kit on a '70 B (w; /html/mgs/2002-05/msg00034.html (8,571 bytes)
4. Re: weber question (score: 1): Author: "Rick Lindsay" <ROLindsay@Emeraldgrc.com>; Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 08:52:26 -0500; More shared opinions, having owned both on multiple cars: Weber DGV: + Easy to install but requires a new manifold, adding considerably to the cost. + Works find if you install a new one. If you inst; /html/mgs/2002-05/msg00035.html (8,850 bytes)
5. RE: Weber Question (score: 1): Author: "Maynard Hirsch" <mghirsch@netzero.net>; Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 10:16:45 -0500; Why would you want to do something like that? The sidedraft Weber's do not perform well at low speeds and the downdraft do not perform well at high speeds. A set of well tuned stock SU's will outperf; /html/mgs/2002-05/msg00038.html (7,744 bytes)
6. RE: weber question (score: 1): Author: Chuck Renner <crenner@dynalivery.com>; Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 12:53:22 -0500; Being in the situation where I'd finally like to ditch the ZS on my '79, I'm wanting to get a set of SUs. For a tad more than the Weber kits, the usual suspects are selling the SU HS6 1 3/4" kits. T; /html/mgs/2002-05/msg00043.html (8,440 bytes)
7. Re: weber question (score: 1): Author: Skye Poier <skye@ffwd.cx>; Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 11:11:50 -0700; Yes, in fact it is overkill even on most modified engines. The size of the carbs is not the "bottleneck" in the MGB engine design; you would have to make substantial changes to the head, intake and e; /html/mgs/2002-05/msg00044.html (8,674 bytes)
8. Re: weber question (score: 1): Author: David Councill <dcouncil@imt.net>; Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 13:19:51 -0600; And to venture even further from the weber subject and more in response to Skye: which would actually be better, HIF4 or HS4 carbs or is there any significant difference in performance? I have the HI; /html/mgs/2002-05/msg00047.html (8,130 bytes)
9. Re: weber question (score: 1): Author: "Mike Janacek" <mjanacek@snet.net>; Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 16:34:56 -0400; ZS test, within since new for /// or try http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool /// Archives at http://www.team.net/archive; /html/mgs/2002-05/msg00052.html (10,137 bytes)
10. Re: weber question (score: 1): Author: Skye Poier <skye@ffwd.cx>; Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 13:57:18 -0700; HIF4's flow a little better than HS4's and the integrated float bowl is less prone to fuel surge. However the biased needle design of HIF4's (and late HS4's) will eventually wear out the jet tube. Al; /html/mgs/2002-05/msg00053.html (8,293 bytes)
11. Re: weber question (score: 1): Author: "Bill Meyer" <wcameyer@msn.com>; Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 16:55:10 -0700; I really like being able to see the nut and see it turn on the HS's. The HIF's used to drive me crazy - never sure if I was really turning anything! Bill /// or try http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorc; /html/mgs/2002-05/msg00061.html (7,558 bytes)
12. Re: weber question (score: 1): Author: Bob Howard <mgbob@juno.com>; Date: Fri, 3 May 2002 21:39:18 -0400; Why take the car back for another try now? Have you not heard the good news that CT is scrapping its present (insert other adjectives here ) emissions test program? The good new is that it is to be; /html/mgs/2002-05/msg00123.html (10,602 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]