Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Fot\]\s+Neg\.\s+camber\s+on\s+1964\s+tr4\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Fot\]\s+Neg\.\s+camber\s+on\s+1964\s+tr4\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [Fot] Neg. camber on 1964 tr4 (score: 1): Author: Jon Gannaway <JGannaway@calstar.org>; Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2013 05:22:33 +0000; I am preparing a 1964 tr4 to vintage race in California. I am looking for simple and easy ways to get negative camber in the car. Any suggestions would be helpful. Jon Gannaway 831-402-4080 Disclaime; /html/fot/2013-03/msg00046.html (10,095 bytes)
2. Re: [Fot] Neg. camber on 1964 tr4 (score: 1): Author: N197TR4@cs.com; Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2013 11:35:38 -0500 (EST); Jon, We (and several others) have sectioned the wishbones to shorten and adjust to about 2.5 degrees, as I remember it. On the other end of the spectrum, Gary Horskorta (in your neighborhood) develop; /html/fot/2013-03/msg00047.html (10,570 bytes)
3. Re: [Fot] Neg. camber on 1964 tr4 (score: 1): Author: Tony Drews <tony@tonydrews.com> ar.corp>; Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2013 13:14:09 -0600; What Richard Good just described for the TR-6 applies to the TR-4 as well. Tony Richard's message if you missed it: "Reversing the upper fulcrum from factory orientation pulls the control arms in 1/4; /html/fot/2013-03/msg00048.html (12,646 bytes)
4. Re: [Fot] Neg. camber on 1964 tr4 (score: 1): Author: davehogye <dlhogye@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2013 19:39:31 +0000 (UTC); Hello Jon, Welcome to the FoT. Thanks Joe, for linking me in to this topic. I too would scan the archives for suspension information. First and foremost, all TR3/4 suspension modifications involve sw; /html/fot/2013-03/msg00049.html (13,300 bytes)
5. Re: [Fot] Neg. camber on 1964 tr4 (score: 1): Author: "Peter Vucinic" <pvucinic@netspace.net.au>; Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2013 12:58:38 +1100; Have a look at the MOSS 1.5 DEG Negative Camber Vertical links. TT3003 Easy and cost effective! Kind Regards Peter Vucinic TR-4 _______________________________________________ fot@autox.team.net http; /html/fot/2013-03/msg00050.html (11,494 bytes)
6. Re: [Fot] Neg. camber on 1964 tr4 (score: 1): Author: Larry Young <cartravel@pobox.com>; Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2013 10:42:45 -0500; It seems like it would be difficult to get enough change in camber for a TR3/4 by reversing the fulcrum. The factory spec is +2 degrees, so it takes quite a lot to get to -2. Lowering helps a little,; /html/fot/2013-03/msg00051.html (14,975 bytes)
7. Re: [Fot] Neg. camber on 1964 tr4 (score: 1): Author: Larry Young <cartravel@pobox.com>; Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2013 13:24:01 -0500; Here is a photo of some upper A arms I did to give 2 degrees negative camber on my TR3 (now John Hasty's) - http://www.flickr.com/photos/53707928@N02 Cut off the end, drill new holes at the correct l; /html/fot/2013-03/msg00052.html (10,240 bytes)
8. Re: [Fot] Neg. camber on 1964 tr4 (score: 1): Author: "Stutzmans" <stutzmans@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2013 18:35:08 -0400 s=q20121106; t=1362954909; bh=92A5GZ+aHfse2TjDOoJw5cPfhkSVuKr+XJEXTNae92Y=; h=Received:Received:Message-ID:From:To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version: Content-Type; b=XH4g5VaDj; Although the manual doesn't say so; I think that when they went to what would be the TR6 upper A arms and ball joint and 3 deg. trunnions (CT6345), the camber changed to 0 deg. from the TR3 and early; /html/fot/2013-03/msg00054.html (17,139 bytes)
9. Re: [Fot] Neg. camber on 1964 tr4 (score: 1): Author: Larry Young <cartravel@pobox.com>; Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2013 18:36:59 -0500; My TR3 had the original suspension A arm system before with 0 caster. If you Iook at my report, I measured something a bit less than 2 degrees camber and not the same from side to side. I chaulked th; /html/fot/2013-03/msg00055.html (10,581 bytes)
10. Re: [Fot] Neg. camber on 1964 tr4 (score: 1): Author: Larry Young <cartravel@pobox.com>; Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2013 19:40:37 -0500; I think that is the same software I used. I did not find an appreciable difference between the two methods (shortening the A arms or moving the pivots inwards). You don't really need suspension softw; /html/fot/2013-03/msg00057.html (10,749 bytes)
11. Re: [Fot] Neg. camber on 1964 tr4 (score: 1): Author: Bob Kramer <rkramer3@austin.rr.com>; Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2013 15:01:41 -0400; I had this mod done on my first TR4. The idea was from Graham Davies, a british car mechanic who used to have a shop here in Austin. He mocked it up on the car to get the desired camber, drilled hole; /html/fot/2013-03/msg00059.html (10,996 bytes)
12. Re: [Fot] Neg. camber on 1964 tr4 (score: 1): Author: Bill Babcock <ponobill@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2013 14:06:07 -1000; According to the analysis I did with my suspension software (SuspPro) the most useful way to change camber on a TR3 is to move the upper arms inward and keep them the same length. I use the TR6 bits; /html/fot/2013-03/msg00060.html (17,785 bytes)
13. Re: [Fot] Neg. camber on 1964 tr4 (score: 1): Author: "Tim Murphy" <timmurph@fastbytes.com>; Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 22:07:31 -0500; Bill, I'm not sure I follow the modification you did. You said you made adjustable upper A-arms with Heim joints, which I'm familiar with. But then you said the length is close to stock and the pivot; /html/fot/2013-03/msg00070.html (19,523 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]