Re: Was now what to do with TOM PATTON

[SloMoIV@aol.com]

In a message dated 3/5/01 8:53:15 AM Pacific Standard Time, MrZAG57@aol.com 
writes:

<< As always happens when people want to start an argument on the list, 
someone 
 takes a potshot and it escalates.
 
 My points stand as stated irregardless of potshots, facts are facts.
 
 ZAG >>


If your "facts" aren't supported, then yes, you can expect replies.  

The careful reader also might decide that more "potshots" are found in your 
original post than in the replies posted so far.