autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Contingency/apocalypse info

To: Phil Vanner <pvanner@pclink.com>
Subject: Re: Contingency/apocalypse info
From: Mike Bultemeier <hottvr@tfs.net>
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 1999 14:11:57 -0500
If everything Lucas on the thing starts to work, keep an eye peeled for a swarm 
of
Locusts.

Mike B. TLS#1

Phil Vanner wrote:

> Another sign:
>
> Yesterday when I left work, I looked under the Spridget to check the oil
> spot.
> Nothing.
> I was alarmed; this could only mean that all of the oil had leaked out on
> my way to work.  I opened the bonnet and pulled the dipstick. Full.
>
> The end is near.
>
> -----Original Message-----
>  Phil's shocking expletives deleted.
>
> >From autox-owner@autox.team.net Wed Jun  9 13:52 CDT 1999
> Received: from triumph.cs.utah.edu (triumph.cs.utah.edu [155.99.188.52])
>         by tango.birch.net  with ESMTP id NAA05982
>         for <hottvr@tfs.net>; Wed, 9 Jun 1999 13:52:51 -0500 (CDT)
> Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost)
>         by triumph.cs.utah.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with SMTP id MAA07259;
>         Wed, 9 Jun 1999 12:52:53 -0600 (MDT)
> Received: (from majordom@localhost)
>         by triumph.cs.utah.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) id MAA07013
>         for autox-actors; Wed, 9 Jun 1999 12:51:10 -0600 (MDT)
> From: dg50@chrysler.com
> X-Lotus-FromDomain: CHRYSLER
> To: autox@autox.team.net
> Message-ID: <8525678B.00675EE1.00@lngodd03.notes.chrysler.com>
> Date: Wed, 9 Jun 1999 14:49:03 -0400
> Subject: Re: Neon ACR and the SCCA
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Disposition: inline
> Sender: owner-autox@autox.team.net
> Precedence: bulk
> Reply-To: dg50@chrysler.com
> Content-Type: text
> Content-Length: 1352
>
> Paul Foster <pfoster@gdi.net> wrote:
>
> Subject: Re: Neon ACR and the SCCA
>
> > Eric Linnhoff wrote:
>
> >> TOTAL HORSEPUCKEY if you ask me!!!  SCREW  the other manufacturers!!!  I
> >> say let 'em continue to lose races if they don't care enough to make a
> >> better (race)car like Chrysler did/does.
>
> > You used the expression '(race)car' 3 times when describing an
> > ostensibly stock car. I rest my case...
>
> Why should "stock" and "race" be mutually exclusive, especially when talking
> about Showroom Stock racing (or for that matter, Solo Stock)?
>
> Are "Stock" cars not allowed to be fast?
>
> Quick! Hide that Viper, and that Corvette too! Hey you! You can't buy that
> Mustang, or that Camaro, or that Talon - it's fast! It might win a race 
>against
> slower cars! That's not fair!
>
> For once, I agree with Linnhoff. If someone makes a well designed, cheap, fast
> car with an outstanding contingency program that winds up dominating a racing
> series, it DESERVES to dominate it. If other people/manufacturers don't like 
>it,
> then let the manufacturer step up to the plate and BUILD A BETTER CAR.
>
> The ACR isn't some oddball, limited production,
> have-to-be-on-the-inside-to-get-one (*cough* Mustang Cobra R *cough*)
> special-order toy, it's something that you can get from any dealer - sometimes
> even off the lot. That's something that should be ENCOURAGED, IMNSHO.
>
> DG


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>