autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Which approach?

To: apozner@epix.net, pesra@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: Which approach?
From: "Jeff Lloyd" <jslz3@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 1999 23:17:38 GMT
I agree with allen, If torque is not included
but with increased hp usually comes more torque,
I can attest that on a 'REAL' tight course
my extra torque can cause a (see small) bit of compeditive
parity in BS

Jeff Lloyd



>From: Alan Pozner <apozner@epix.net>
>Reply-To: Alan Pozner <apozner@epix.net>
>To: Phil Esra <pesra@yahoo.com>
>CC: autox@autox.team.net
>Subject: Re: Which approach?
>Date: Wed, 15 Sep 1999 17:49:09 -0400
>
>Phil Esra wrote:
> >
> > Fellow homebodies,
> >
> > Which of these would you pick for autox? Assume all else to be equal.
> >
> > Choice A: 2000 lb, 100 hp, 20 lb/hp
> > Choice B: 2500 lb, 139 hp, 18 lb/hp
> >
> > Toto, I don't think I can stay away from Kansas any more,
> >
> > Phil Esra
>
>I'd choose A. If all else is equal then I've got a much better handling
>car. If I can keep speed through a corner higher in the lighter car then
>the lb/hp difference may be completely negated.
>
>Regards,
>Alan Pozner


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>