autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Which approach?

To: bruce haden <bhaden@ucsd.edu>, autox@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: Which approach?
From: Phil Esra <pesra@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 1999 15:56:00 -0700 (PDT)
Hi Bruce,

By saying "assume all else to be equal," I hoped to negate the factors
that you mention... picture 2 theoretical Civics (or 2 Corvairs), one
with specs that match (a), and one with specs that match (b).

thanks,

Phil

--- bruce haden <bhaden@ucsd.edu> wrote:
> At 02:03 PM 9/15/99 -0700, Phil Esra wrote:
> >Fellow homebodies,
> >
> >Which of these would you pick for autox? Assume all else to be
> equal.
> >
> >Choice A: 2000 lb, 100 hp, 20 lb/hp
> >Choice B: 2500 lb, 139 hp, 18 lb/hp
> >
> WAAAAY too general. Lighter is usually better, but other things enter
> into it.
> I assume you are talking stock class since you mentioned HP numbers,
> implying that modifications are out. Front drive or rear drive? Nose
> heavy?
> Crappy suspension? Example; a "180hp" , 2600lb Corvair would probably
> 
> get killed by a 60hp, 1600lb  Civic. It's not as simple as
> power/weight ratio.
> If you go to SP or Prepared that complicates it by a factor of 10.
> 
> 


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>