autox
[Top] [All Lists]

## Re: Lightweight wheels, drive only?

 To: "'autox@autox.team.net'" Re: Lightweight wheels, drive only? Alan Pozner Mon, 31 Jul 2000 11:43:45 -0400
 ```William wrote: >>Okay, but here's something I thought of over the weekend... The drive wheels are being rotated by the axle or driveshaft, at the center of rotation of the wheel. It's lever arm is only as long as the radius of the rotating parts in the engine, in this case, I'd say the crankshaft... right? The non-drive wheels are being rotated by the ground, at the largest diameter of the wheel/tire. This is generally a longer lever arm than any rotating part in the engine, isn't it? So all other considerations aside for the moment, isn't the non-drive wheel "easier" to rotate than the drive wheel, because it has a longer lever arm? Am I making any sense at all? I won't make any claims to be an engineer, which should be quite obvious to anyone who really is one. So, tell me why I'm wrong! William (this pocket protector stuff is kinda fun!) Loring<< What's wrong with the logic can be summed up by saying, "how you do the work has no effect on the amount of work done" In other words, the non drive wheels need to spin up to a certain speed just like the drive wheels. If both sets of wheels weigh the same then when they are at speed they will have the same kinetic energy. So it must have taken the same amount of energy to get them there (all other things being equal) Regards, Alan Pozner ```
 Current Thread RE: Lightweight wheels, drive only?, GRMPer Re: Lightweight wheels, drive only?, jon e prevo Re: Lightweight wheels, drive only?, dg50 Re: Lightweight wheels, drive only?, Mark Sirota Re: Lightweight wheels, drive only?, Otto Crosser Re: Lightweight wheels, drive only?, Alan Pozner <= Re: Lightweight wheels, drive only?, jon e prevo Re: Lightweight wheels, drive only?, William Loring Re: Lightweight wheels, drive only?, William Loring Re: Lightweight wheels, drive only?, Alan Pozner