autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Was M3 - - now ESP participation

To: autox@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: Was M3 - - now ESP participation
From: Erik Van-der-Mey <autox@webcentrix.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2000 18:04:21 -0500
>Howdy,
>
>On Mon, 18 Sep 2000 dg50@daimlerchrysler.com wrote:
>>  > Bottom line ESP should not be
>>  > able to be dominated like it has been this year by a non-Pony car.  With
>>  > _any_ driver.)
>>  Well, the M3 aside, where does it say in the rules that ESP must be won by
>>  a Mustang or Camarobird? If it runs ESP times, then it's an ESP car - the
>>  name on the fender doesn't matter.
>
>First, I said "Dominated" not "won by".  There's a distinct difference.
>Everyone going to nationals that paid attention to the results knew who
>was gonna win ESP already.
>
>Second, the name on the fender does kinda matter.  ESP is supposed to be a
>pony car class.  Perhaps that's never been made official, but there's no
>question that's the majority opinion.
>

So what is the majority opinion of what ESP is supposed to be??

(please be specific for those of us not in ESP or other SP classes...)

-- 
Erik Van-der-Mey                          erik@nolimitsperformance.com
No Limits Performance, Inc.             http://nolimitsperformance.com
1997 Dodge Neon ACR - Lapis Blue (say no to camber kits/trunk kits...)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>